+1 on picking one, instead of having both. I don't have any preference though.
Yufei On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 1:37 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <di...@apache.org> wrote: > My personal preference is minikube. > > Cheers, > Dmitri. > > On Sat, Jul 5, 2025 at 8:22 PM Yong Zheng <yzh...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Currently, we provide Kubernetes references for both Kind ( > > https://kind.sigs.k8s.io/) and Minikube ( > > https://minikube.sigs.k8s.io/docs/). In terms of tooling, Kind is very > > lightweight, whereas Minikube is much more feature-rich and works out of > > the box. (Some workarounds or additional steps are required to make Kind > do > > the same, but those details are out of scope for this discussion.) > > > > In terms of the features and documentation we offer to others, either > > option will work. However, I think the overhead of maintaining support > for > > both tools is unnecessary. I don’t have a strong preference for which one > > we choose, but I believe it will be easier to support additional > automation > > if we stick to a single tool. > > > > Thanks, > > Yong Zheng > > >
