My take on some of these issues: * #777 (persistence concurrency) can be closed. * #552 (odd locations) is not a 1.0 blocker (but needs to be addressed)
Additionally, I think https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1532 also needs to be addressed for 1.0 at least in most aspects. In order to enable gradual progress while taking more time to resolve controversial points, IMHO, https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1566 could be merged first. More specifically, I believe the user-facing warnings in 1532 need to be added for 1.0, however, I can see that people have different opinions on how exactly those warnings should be implemented... This is why I think 1566 might be worth merging first, even though it will create additional rebasing / reworking burden on 1532. No opinion on other issues. Cheers, Dmitri. On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 5:39 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi folks, > > Many users have been asking about the Polaris release, and I believe it's > critical to have a formal, production-ready 1.0 release ASAP. Thanks to the > community’s hard work, we’re very close with a few remaining blockers we > need to resolve. > > To keep things moving, I scheduled a community meeting for the 1.0 release > next Monday at 9 AM PST. At the same time, sharing all issues marked with > 1.0 blocker. We could resolve them here if possible. Feel free to chime in, > remove the blocker tag if you think it's not a blocker, or pick any up. > Thanks a lot in advance! > > Here is the list: > > - Add CI for Python code ( > <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/1058>#1058), > - Polaris persistence concurrency issues (#777) > <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/777> > - Task handling is incomplete (#774) > <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/774> > - Generated files in regtests/client/python/polaris (#755) > <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/755> > - Resources not properly closed, resource & memory leaks (#563) > <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/563> > - Make Polaris safe against certain unparseable locations (#552) > <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/552> > - [BUG] Assumption that cache eviction does not happen (#544) > <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/544> > > To make it more interactive, you can also comment on the google > spreadsheet here: > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GyLvp2cdYwioOsBwszNWiphZt_IIdo4LIfsZBFV88mc/edit?usp=sharing > > Yufei >
