Thanks everyone for voting and providing input! The vote has now been open for about two days, and since all stakeholders who have been active on this topic have already cast votes and no new comments have been raised in the associated discussion thread on the mailing list or in the PR since last week, I'm going to go ahead and proceed.
Results: +1: 5 (binding), 4 (non-binding) +0: 0 (binding), 0 (non-binding) -1: 0 (binding), 0 (non-binding) On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 9:30 AM yun zou <yunzou.colost...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > Best, > Yun > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 9:22 AM Honah J. <hon...@apache.org> wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Best, > > Honah (Jonas) > > > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 8:22 AM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > Yufei > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 8:03 AM Prashant Singh > > > <prashant.si...@snowflake.com.invalid> wrote: > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > Prashant > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 7:01 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov < > di...@apache.org> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 LGTM. > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > Dmitri. > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 12:30 AM Dennis Huo <huoi...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > > > > > > > We've had some productive discussion in various places on the > > mailing > > > > > list, > > > > > > in the github PR, and in the live community sync now about the > > > initial > > > > > > minimal updates to the Polaris REST API (under the "management > > API") > > > > for > > > > > > adding a ConnectionConfigInfo field to ExternalCatalogs to > > represent > > > > > > external federation: > > > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/szq8nzhblgwz0w71g5wh8kkcwbm7nhkn > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1026 > > > > > > > > > > > > To recap, the the ConnectionConfigInfo is designed to be > extensible > > > so > > > > > that > > > > > > we can eventually define a variety of federation sources, but > > > currently > > > > > > just defines a minimal Iceberg REST federation so that we have a > > good > > > > > > starting point to start implementing the internals of federation > > > > without > > > > > > biting off too much. > > > > > > > > > > > > We've also agreed the current proposed API is marked as > > > "experimental" > > > > > and > > > > > > "subject to change", so this step also doesn't entrench the API > > > > > definition > > > > > > in stone yet. > > > > > > > > > > > > This thread commences our formal vote for addition of this > initial > > > API > > > > > and > > > > > > merging the PR listed above. > > > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 Merge https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1026 > > > > > > [ ] +0 > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not merge because... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
