I'd be happier if you voted -1, that would have made the decision easier for me. I'm -1 now ... Sorry - you (PMCs) are always welcomed to jump in as a release manager.
So we have 550 failing files or new exceptions, that could be just a small amount - but at least it's a regression. I've decided to roll another RC - this is not much of an effort for me and saves a bit of discussion later. I don't think we need another regression run. Andi. On 10.02.20 18:58, Tim Allison wrote: > Sorry for the late reply. See Bug 64130 for a regression in parsing old > excel spreadsheets that have worksheets without names. There were about > 550 new exceptions caused by this in our regression corpus. > > On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 5:30 PM Tim Allison <talli...@apache.org> wrote: > >> I’m afk, but it looked like there was a regression on old excel >> files...check new exceptions file. >> >> I didn’t get a chance to confirm this wasn’t a Tika artifact w pure POI, >> but I did confirm at the Tika level on one govdocs file that there was a >> new exception. >> >> Sorry I don’t have more info and I’m afk. >> >> On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 1:21 PM Andreas Beeker <kiwiwi...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi *, >>> >>> just to be sure ... I'm waiting for Tims second +1 or should I release >>> the artifacts? >>> I.e. as far as I understand the reports we only have marginal differences. >>> >>> Andi >>> >>> On 07.02.20 13:05, Tim Allison wrote: >>>> Hi All,, >>>> I haven't had the chance to look, but will do so later today:: >>>> http://162.242.228.174/reports/poi_4.1.2_reports.tgz >>>> >>> >>>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
