Andi and All,
  I don't see anything in emf/wmf parsing any more that should hold up
the release. I opened a trivial, non-blocking issue for better error
reporting.
  Let me know if/when I should run the full regression tests.  Again,
apologies for my delay!

          Cheers,

                     Tim


On Sat, Oct 5, 2019 at 8:38 AM Tim Allison <talli...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Andi,
>   I’m sorry for my delay. I’ve booked a chunk of time on Monday to look at 
> this...data is prepped...just need to run latest code and compare. I don’t 
> want to hold up the release tho...please move forward as you see fit.
>
>    Best,
>       Tim
>
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 3:05 PM Andreas Beeker <kiwiwi...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Tim,
>>
>> On 20.09.19 13:55, Tim Allison wrote:
>> > I think I remember a regression in emf/wmf...could be spurious or my fault
>> > at the Tika level.
>>
>> I've just checked my mails for the original emf/wmf issue, which you've 
>> (partly) fixed via #63327.
>>
>> Apart of that you've written:
>> > "http://162.242.228.174/reports/poi-4.1.0-reports.zip
>> > ...
>> > 2) The emf/wmf regressions are responsible for the decrease in attachments 
>> > and common words.
>> > 3) It looks like there are spacing problems/new line problems with the 
>> > update emf/wmf code, but that might be on Tika's side."
>>
>> If this is still a problem, can you provide an example file?
>>
>> I'll be off again for a week, but I'd really like to push the next POI 
>> version.
>>
>> Regarding XMLBeans (XMLBEANS-536), I haven't touched the project for quite 
>> some time, not sure when I will find the muse to continue ... :(
>>
>> Andi
>>
>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

Reply via email to