Nick, could you republish the Javadocs, please?
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Javen O'Neal <one...@apache.org> wrote:
>> switch (cell.getCellType()) {
>> case Cell.CELL_TYPE_NUMERIC:
>
> I have fixed the backwards compatibility problem in r1757235. See [1]
> for more info.
>
> My vote is -1. We should rebuild the RC with r1757235.
>
> I have added this test [2] to prove that the old way of working with
> cell types works without modification alongside the new way.
>
> [1] https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59791#c10
> [2]
> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/poi/trunk/src/testcases/org/apache/poi/ss/usermodel/BaseTestCell.java?r1=1757235&r2=1757234&pathrev=1757235
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Dominik Stadler <dominik.stad...@gmx.at>
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Oh, sorry for the false alarm, this seems to be a problem with my
>> compare-tool (Beyond Compare), it displays two test-documents as being
>> contained on top-level of the src-tar.gz. When extracting via other tools I
>> don't see those.
>>
>> So I am +1 here!
>>
>> However I saw that we do actually break some stuff with all the
>> Enum-rework, e.g. the following will not work any more out of the box:
>>
>> switch (cell.getCellType()) {
>> case Cell.CELL_TYPE_NUMERIC:
>>
>> Unfortunately a switch on teh CellType is quite common, so we need to
>> explain this in the release notes and I think we should be a bit more
>> conservative with all those refactorings/deprecations in the future to not
>> cause too much change in those places!
>>
>> Dominik.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:10 AM, David North <dno...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Your image didn't come through. I see the following inside the poi-3.15
>>> directory of poi-src-3.15-20160828.zip:
>>>
>>> legal
>>> osgi
>>> sonar
>>> src
>>> test-data
>>> build.xml
>>> forrest.properties
>>> KEYS
>>> LICENSE
>>> NOTICE
>>> patch.xml
>>>
>>> Which are unwanted? This seems to match the src packages in the last beta.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> David
>>>
>>> On 22/08/16 07:47, Dominik Stadler wrote:
>>> > Sorry, me again,
>>> >
>>> > Unfortunately there are still some unwanted artifacts in the
>>> > src-package, can you remove those as well?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Inline image 1
>>> >
>>> > While not blocking the release, but the Java version used for the build
>>> > seems to be "1.6.0_34", which is a bit outdated, latest (and last)
>>> > version of Java 6 is patchlevel 45, would look better to use this one to
>>> > build releases.
>>> >
>>> > Dominik.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:49 AM, David North <dno...@apache.org
>>> > <mailto:dno...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Vote begins now and ends at 11:55 BST 2016-08-23
>>> >
>>> > Artifacts are here:
>>> >
>>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/3.15-RC1/
>>> > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/3.15-RC1/>
>>> >
>>> > Usual checks required (does it work? does the distribution look
>>> right?),
>>> > only more so as this is an RC for a non-beta release.
>>> >
>>> > +1 from me.
>>> >
>>> > As those of you watching the commits may have seen, I can't get the
>>> svn
>>> > commits from ant to work on either of my machines (Debian stable or
>>> > Fedora 22) - I thought I'd fixed it by upgrading to svn 1.9, but
>>> > seemingly not. I've therefore replaced them with "exec" tasks calling
>>> > the SVN command line client. This needs further investigation.
>>> >
>>> > I also had to manually strip out the spurious "trunk" directory from
>>> the
>>> > src zip/tar, so that's another fix needed somewhere in the build
>>> > scripts.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > David North | www.dnorth.net <http://www.dnorth.net>
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>> --
>>> David North - Committer and PMC Member, Apache POI
>>> https://home.apache.org/~dnorth/
>>>
>>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
