Tested RC2 without any problems on an POI-powered application at $dayjob. +1. On Apr 11, 2016 8:08 AM, "Allison, Timothy B." <talli...@mitre.org> wrote:
> +1 (relying on tests for RC1) and successful build of RC2. > > Thank you, Andi, for running this release! > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dominik Stadler [mailto:dominik.stad...@gmx.at] > Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2016 5:58 AM > To: POI Developers List <dev@poi.apache.org> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15-beta1 release (RC2) > > Ok, then +1 from me! > > Thanks... Dominik > > On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Andreas Beeker <kiwiwi...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Hi Dominik, > > > > I've renamed it to beta1 [1] now - the reason for it was, that the svn > > commit was via the new ant scripts where I've forgotten to specify the > > -Dversion.id and -DDSTAMP, but the content should be ok. > > > > Andi. > > > > [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/3.15-beta1-RC2 > > > > On 10.04.2016 08:09, Dominik Stadler wrote: > > > Hi Andi, > > > > > > the "beta2" in the filenames/directories looks incorrect, or? > > > > > > Dominik. > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 11:36 PM, Andreas Beeker > > > <kiwiwi...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> I've prepared another release candidate with Tims changes: > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/3.15-beta2-RC2 > > >> > > >> I'm not sure how often this error would happen, but I guess its > > >> better > > to > > >> be safe than ... > > >> > > >> Andi. > > >> > > >> > > >> On 08.04.2016 23:58, Allison, Timothy B. wrote: > > >>> I just finished the run. This compares 3.15-beta1-rc1 with > > >>> 3.13-final > > >> (what we had in Tika 1.12). > > >>> Results are here: > > >>> http://162.242.228.174/reports/reports_poi_3_15-beta1-rc1.tar.bz2 > > >>> > > >>> I've only had a chance to look at the results briefly...it looks > > >>> like > > no > > >> major issues. We're getting quite a bit more content out of ppt > > >> and > > pptx! > > >>> Overall, we're extracting ~500k more common English words. There > > >>> are a > > >> few files that will require further investigation on content > > loss...some of > > >> that may be Tika's fault. See > > >> contents/content_diffs_with_exceptions.xlsx. I found if I > > >> subtracted commonA from commonB and then sorted, that was a good > > >> way to find docs > > that > > >> lost content. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> -----Original Message----- > > >>> From: kiwiwings [mailto:kiwiwi...@apache.org] > > >>> Sent: Friday, April 08, 2016 11:41 AM > > >>> To: dev@poi.apache.org > > >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15-beta1 release (RC1) > > >>> > > >>> Hi All, > > >>> > > >>> Is it ok, to create RC2 from the trunk? > > >>> If not, I'll apply Tims changes to the 3.15-beta1 tag. > > >>> > > >>> Andi > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For > > >> additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional > > commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org > >
