In addition the few improvements mentioned above - Ozone Snapshot Phase 3 HDDS-12940 - Container and volume scanners phase II HDDS-8387
A few big improvements are also worth mentioning: 1. HDDS-12564 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-12564> Handling disk issues in Datanodes - Phase II 1. HDDS-12716 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-12716> Ozone S3 gateway Phase 4 On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 1:58 AM Chung En Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Thank you for all the discussion and feedback. Based on our ongoing > discussions and the consensus so far, I'd like to propose the following > schedule for the Apache Ozone 2.1.0 release: > > ~8/29 Freeze scope > 8/30~9/19 Freeze code > 9/20~ Start the RC (Release Candidate) process > > The features to be included in this release are expected to be: > > - Container Reconciliation HDDS-10239 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-10239> > - Disk Balancer HDDS-5713 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-5713 > > > - Ozone Short Circuit Read HDDS-10685 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-10685> > - Container and volume scanners phase II HDDS-8387 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-8387> > - Ozone Snapshot Phase 3 HDDS-12940 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-12940> > - Replace goofys with mountpoint-s3 HDDS-13356 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-13356> > > I look forward to your feedback on this proposed timeline. > > Thanks, > chung en > > On 2025/08/11 18:20:15 Wei-Chiu Chuang wrote: > > Container Reconciliation is merged into master. A few leftover minor > items > > are being worked on. HDDS-10239 > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-10239> > > Disk balancer branch is voted to merge into master HDDS-5713 > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-5713> > > > > > > Ozone Snapshot Phase 3 HDDS-12940 > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-12940> -- we finished 3 > out > > of the 4 subprojects. The last one Snapshot Defragmentation HDDS-13003 > is > > making good progress. Should reach dev completion in a month or so. > Think > > it can make into Ozone 2.1 > > > > > > > > > > S3 Lifecycle is making steady progress -- it's a big project so I'm not > > sure if it'll make it soon. > > > > Looks like HDDS-11523 > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-11523> Listener > > OM support is picking up steam again. > > Maybe we can include HDDS-13356 > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-13356> (replace goofys with > > mountpoint-s3) too. Looks like a medium level effort. Peter is working on > > these two projects. > > > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 6:20 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > 1. I am aware of a few other projects being actively developed > > > > > > Volume / Container scanner is being pursued by @Ethan Rose > > > <[email protected]> and team. HDDS-8387 > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-8387> > > > Ozone Short Circuit Read HDDS-10685 > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-10685> by @Sammi Chen > > > <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > Ozone Snapshot Phase 3 HDDS-12940 > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-12940> > > > > > > > > > These could be included in the 2.1 scope too. > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 5:58 PM Chung En Lee - Apache < > [email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Hi community, > > >> > > >> I would like to initiate a discussion about the upcoming Apache Ozone > 2.1 > > >> release. My primary goal is to push for a more regular and predictable > > >> release schedule, as I believe this would accelerate the delivery of > > >> features more effectively. > > >> > > >> For the 2.1 release, I propose including the following new features or > > >> improvements: > > >> > > >> *- Container Reconciliation* > > >> > > >> *- S3 Lifecycle* > > >> > > >> > > >> *- Disk Balancer* > > >> > > >> Besides the usual binary distributions, I'm hoping we can also provide > > >> Ozone in the following ways: > > >> > > >> - *DEB/RPM packages* > > >> > > >> *- ARM architecture binaries* > > >> > > >> What are your thoughts? Looking forward to your feedback! > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> > > >> Chung En > > >> > > > > > >
