> ... Is there any particular reason we want Java 11? Just want to be more inclusive. Requiring a higher Java version may exclude more applications. We could be forcing the dependent projects such as HBase to bump their Java version. Not sure if it is true.
> So for these reasons I think making a client/server distinction in the Java version requirement would be better, instead of Recon vs. everything else. That's a good point! We should require a lower Java version for the client-side. It probably should stay at Java 8. Tsz-Wo On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 12:36 PM Attila Doroszlai <adorosz...@apache.org> wrote: > > Could it be that only Recon requires Java 21? > > Yes, technically only Recon (its dependencies) as far as I know. But: > > - I think it's easier to manage hosts with uniform Java version > - we don't know when some other dependency of OM/SCM/etc. starts > requiring newer Java > > So for these reasons I think making a client/server distinction in the > Java version requirement would be better, instead of Recon vs. > everything else. > > -Attila > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ozone.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ozone.apache.org > >
