Thanks Anu and Steven for the suggestion. Granting a lease to client sounds like a more controllable way.
However, if I understand correctly, clients don't talk to SCM directly. Does it mean OM has to relay the renew lease request to SCM? Is there a better way to implement it? Regards Kaijie ---- On Sat, 10 Sep 2022 01:10:28 +0800 anu engineer wrote --- > Extending the same thought from Steven. If you are going to do a small > delay, it is better to do it via a Lease. > > So SCM could offer a lease for 60 seconds, with a provision to reacquire > the lease one more time. > This does mean that a single container inside the data node technically > could become larger than 5GB (but that is possible even today). > > I do think a lease or a timeout based approach (as suggested by Steven) > might be easier than pre-allocating blocks. > > Thanks > Anu --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ozone.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ozone.apache.org
