+1 for merge.

Thanks,
Bharat

On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 1:41 PM Uma Maheswara Rao Gangumalla <
umaganguma...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> Regards,
> Uma
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 2:15 AM Sammi Chen <sammic...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Dear Ozone Devs,
> >
> > I 'm starting this thread to vote for the merge of Ozone Datanode RocksDB
> > merge feature branch (HDDS-3630
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3630) into the master branch.
> >
> > Currently there will be one RocksDB for each Container on datanode, which
> > leads to hundreds of thousands of RocksDB instances on one datanode. It's
> > very challenging to manage this amount of RocksDB instances in one JVM.
> > Please refer to the "problem statement" section of the design document[1]
> > for challenge details. Unlike the current approach, Datanode RocksDB
> merge
> > feature will use only one RocksDB for each data volume. With far fewer
> > RocksDB instances to manage, the write path performance and DN stability
> > are improved, Refer to the Micro Benchmark Data section of the design
> > document[1].
> >
> > The feature has been developed in the last 8 months. And it has also been
> > deployed in Tencent production for 5 months. Now we have reviewed all
> core
> > patches, and merged them into the feature branch,  including new disk
> > layout, new container schema, container replication, container deletion,
> > block deletion, container scanner, non-rolling upgrade. There are no
> > blocking JIRAs left. Document and the acceptance test are added too.
> >
> > For the sake of master branch feature stability, we provide a
> configuration
> > to enable/disable this feature. Currently by default, this feature is
> > disabled. We can turn it on later once we believe it is stable enough.
> >
> > For more information, please check out the Merge RocksDB in datanode
> > feature wiki page here:
> >
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OZONE/Merge+Rocksdb+in+Datanode+%28HDDS-3630%29+Merge+Checklist
> >
> > Great thanks to Mark Gui<guim...@126.com>, majority feature
> investigation,
> > design and core development is contributed by him. Thanks a lot to Runzhi
> > Wang,  for first finding current schema V2 layout challenges and
> initiating
> > the proposal of merge RocksDB,  to Nanda, Mukul, Wei-Chiu, Jackson and
> > Stephen O’Donnell for the help in design review, design discussion and
> code
> > review.  If I miss anyone here, sorry for that,  but your efforts are
> well
> > appreciated.
> >
> >
> > [1] Merge RocksDB in Datanode Design Doc
> > <
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oPCRUVqTJDbYITbwvoVCOZ2-k108FwOXVhq9ukDKHbQ/edit#heading=h.w06vnlv65sb6
> > >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Sammi
> >
>

Reply via email to