Also a reminder that there is still a merge vote for HDDS-4440 ongoing as
well. It may be best to resolve that before discussing a release.

On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 7:32 AM Ethan Rose <er...@cloudera.com> wrote:

> Hi MingChao, thanks for driving this effort.
>
> We have a few release blockers on the upgrade side that need to be
> resolved before we can release:
> - SCM HA finalization (I have begun working on this): HDDS-5141
> - Onboarding FSO into the upgrade framework (this can start now that EC
> has been onboarded): HDDS-6040
> - Client cross compatibility for FSO (I'm not sure if we have a separate
> Jira for this are planning on using HDDS-6040 for this as well)
>
> We should also clarify the state of the container balancer before we
> release 1.3.0. Work in that area has been taking place on the master
> branch, so the release will contain it. We need to document whether this is
> stable enough to use or should be considered beta quality.
>
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 5:35 AM guimark <guim...@126.com> wrote:
>
>> I think we could mark EC as a [tech preview] feature clearly in this
>> 1.3.0 release.
>>
>> And we could release EC as a completed feature in the next release if
>> possible.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> At 2022-04-22 20:26:07, "Kota Uenishi" <k...@preferred.jp> wrote:
>> >I would welcome 1.3 release even without EC available. This is because
>> >a lot of other features and fixes I need in our system. For example,
>> >HDDS-5881, HDDS-5461, HDDS-5656, HDDS-5975, HDDS-6321 and such.
>> >Delivering them would be very valuable.
>> >As RocksDB crash is also happening in our cluster intermittently, so I
>> >also bet some of my pennies onto updating RocksDB to 7.0.4 with some
>> >hope.
>> >
>> >EC is not in the road map planed after 1.2 release, too [1]. But I
>> >agree that it can be de-emphasized, and EC readiness can be announced
>> >in some later version like 1.4.0.
>> >
>> >[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OZONE/Ozone+Roadmap
>> >
>> >On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 8:17 PM Kaijie Chen <c...@kaijie.org.invalid>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I think 1.2.2 sounds like a bug fix version.If we are going to release
>> a new feature version, 1.3.0 would be the proper name. ---- On 星期五, 22 四月
>> 2022 19:13:18 +0800  captain...@apache.org  wrote ----Thanks @Stephen
>> for your feedback.
>> >>
>> >> Maybe we can de-emphasize the EC in this version. If EC recovery is
>> >> completed, it will take until the second half of the year.
>> >> It's been a little long since the last release.  Since last release,
>> FSO,
>> >> S3gateway, OM, container Balancer have made some
>> >> optimizations and bug fixes.  We could even release a small version
>> this
>> >> time, like 1.2.2.  We can release 1.3 next time.
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 5:43 PM Stephen O'Donnell
>> >> <sodonn...@cloudera.com.invalid> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > My feeling is that it may be worth waiting until the recovery side
>> of EC is
>> >> > working before releasing. As it stands, EC is not in a usable form -
>> the
>> >> > feature is half done. If we release 1.3.0 now, we cannot state EC is
>> >> > available in it.
>> >> >
>> >> > On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 9:43 AM mingchao zhao <captain...@apache.org
>> >
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > > Dear all,
>> >> > >
>> >> > > It has been a few months since the Ozone 1.2.0 & 1.2.1 release,
>> and we
>> >> > have
>> >> > > had a
>> >> > > number of new features (EC)and some optimization(s3gateway) and
>> some
>> >> > > bug fixes
>> >> > > for 1.2 that have been merged to master since then. I think this
>> would
>> >> > be a
>> >> > > good time
>> >> > > to work on the Ozone 1.3.0 release. Also, I volunteered to take up
>> the
>> >> > role
>> >> > > of the
>> >> > > Release Manager for this release.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Please let me know what you think.
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > --
>> >> > > Thanks & Regards,
>> >> > > MingChao
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >--
>> >Kota UENISHI, Engineer
>> >
>> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ozone.apache.org
>> >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ozone.apache.org
>>
>

Reply via email to