+1 for rebase Thanks Shashi
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 2:10 PM Hui Fei <feihui.u...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for bringing this up. > > Share an article for introducing Rebase: > https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Branching-Rebasing. > There is a sentence "to tell the story in the way that’s best for future > readers" in this article and it makes sense. > > "Merge" is more friendly for branch developers, and "Rebase" is more > friendly for future developers. > > From the whole project angle, +1 on Rebase. Cleaner history, easier trouble > shooting and faster development. > > Tsz Wo Sze <szets...@apache.org> 于2021年8月12日周四 上午9:55写道： > > > Hi Ozone dev, > > > > We should discuss whether we want to do "merge" or "rebase" for > > the HDDS-4454 branch. This a standard git question: > > > > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/804115/when-do-you-use-git-rebase-instead-of-git-merge > > > > I suggest to do "rebase" rather than "merge" since it can keep the commit > > history. Any thoughts? > > > > Tsz-Wo > > >
