Hi Dominic,

        Thanks for taking this on.

        I'll be kicking off the last set of votes for the runtime release
wave we need to move from go 1.12 to go 1.15 for the actionloop proxy
today.   I think we should include these new versions in the core release,
but that doesn't prevent progress on closing out the other PRs and getting
the core repo + documentation into release-ready state.

        Once we create the branch for the core 1.0.0 release, we can merge
PRs to that branch to change 'nightly' to the appropriate release tag for
all the runtimes, cli, docker images, etc.
--dave




From:   Dominic Kim <style9...@gmail.com>
To:     dev@openwhisk.apache.org
Date:   10/03/2020 12:22 AM
Subject:        [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSS] Release the "openwhisk" core modules.



Since there is no more comment, I would try to merge the PRs and keep going
on the release process.

-dom


2020년 9월 29일 (화) 오후 7:32, Rodric Rabbah <rod...@gmail.com>님이 작성:

> +1 🎉
>
>
> -r
>
> > On Sep 29, 2020, at 4:22 AM, Dominic Kim <style9...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > We have a bunch of new features such as a new scheduler, action
> versioning,
> > and more fine-grained permission management, and so on.
> >
> > Before moving forward, I believe this is a good time to release the
> current
> > version as 1.0.0.
> >
> > I think we can include the following PRs to 1.0.0 release.
> >
> > - Go version currency - add 1.15 and deprecate 1.11[1]
> > - Add release to runtime pod and delete with release[2]
> > - Add Activation Error Logging Config to Container Proxy[3]
> > - Fix Swagger and API mismatch for action, trigger, rule list[4]
> > - Use latest code if action's revision is mismatched[5]
> > - Improvements to parameter encryption to support per-namespace keys[6]
> >
> > Please share your opinion and if I miss any important features, please
> let
> > me know.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Regards
> > -dom
> >
> > [1]:
https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4987

> > [2]:
https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4979

> > [3]:
https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4981

> > [4]:
https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4982

> > [5]:
https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4954

> > [6]:
https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4855

>


Reply via email to