2020-09-30 01:04:27 UTC - Dominic Kim: I suppose if you don't runc, there might 
not be a big issue when migrating from 1.13 to 18.06.
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1601427867011500?thread_ts=1601419860.011200&cid=C3TPCAQG1
----
2020-09-30 01:04:55 UTC - Dominic Kim: Since 18.06 the `runc` command is 
renamed to `docker-runc`  so it was a breaking change at that time.
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1601427895011700?thread_ts=1601419860.011200&cid=C3TPCAQG1
----
2020-09-30 01:05:47 UTC - Dominic Kim: Also the `root` directory of runc is 
also changed.
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1601427947011900?thread_ts=1601419860.011200&cid=C3TPCAQG1
----
2020-09-30 01:06:04 UTC - Dominic Kim: You may find this useful.
<https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4430/files#diff-2d879ae862e88c1fe4c4e19affaeffddR185>
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1601427964012100?thread_ts=1601419860.011200&cid=C3TPCAQG1
----
2020-09-30 01:07:54 UTC - Dominic Kim: In our tests, `runc` outperformed the 
`docker` command.
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1601428074012300?thread_ts=1601419860.011200&cid=C3TPCAQG1
----
2020-09-30 01:08:28 UTC - Dominic Kim: It showed around 6 to 9 times more RPS.
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1601428108012500?thread_ts=1601419860.011200&cid=C3TPCAQG1
----
2020-09-30 01:09:11 UTC - Dominic Kim: This is one of the results.
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1601428151012700?thread_ts=1601419860.011200&cid=C3TPCAQG1
----
2020-09-30 01:09:14 UTC - Dominic Kim: 
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1601428154012900?thread_ts=1601419860.011200&cid=C3TPCAQG1
----
2020-09-30 07:32:56 UTC - Brendan Doyle: So our invoker hosts are already on 
docker 19.x for the actual server, it’s just the docker client version used in 
the invoker image we never upgraded from 1.12 when you upgraded last year. If 
the host docker version is already upgraded, flipping on runc shouldn’t be a 
problem for us because the default config already points to the new directory 
location for runc? And the code change for the new docker-runc command we 
should already be on because we’re on the latest commit. Does that seem right? 
Should be easy for me to test, but wanted to check if I’m missing anything
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1601451176018700?thread_ts=1601419860.011200&cid=C3TPCAQG1
----
2020-09-30 10:17:38 UTC - Dominic Kim: Yes I think so
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1601461058019100?thread_ts=1601419860.011200&cid=C3TPCAQG1
----
2020-09-30 13:16:53 UTC - Dominic Kim: Welcome @Shariar Kabir
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1601471813019800
----
2020-09-30 15:59:44 UTC - Shariar Kabir: Thank you Mr. Kim.
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1601481584020600
----

Reply via email to