I use Logstash as the sidecar container to drain action container's logs to 
Elastic

-----Original Message-----
From: "Rodric Rabbah"<rod...@gmail.com>
To: <dev@openwhisk.apache.org>;
Cc:
Sent: 2020/9/1周二 12:55 (GMT+08:00)
Subject: Re: [Discussion]Runtime log collection issue on K8S
 
Do you drain logs directly from memory to Elastic or do you use the
FileLogStore which then drains the logs to Elastic?

-r

On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 5:43 AM 蒋鹏程 <jiang.pengch...@navercorp.com> wrote:

> Hello guys:
> ​
>  Recently we are trying to migrate OpenWhisk from docker to K8S, but faced
> some problems, and one of it is: the performance droped a lot(the tps
> changed from thousands to dozens in our environment during benchmarks)
> after migrating to K8S, and the reason we founded is that all action
> containers will trying to fetch action logs from K8S api server after `run`
> are finished, and these log requests become very slow when there are logs
> of concurrent activations comes, which in turn leads to a very low tps of
> activations.
> ​
>  To resolve such issue, we tried below 2 ways:
> ​
>
> mount a shared volume for all action pods and invoker pods, and make
> invoker read action logs from shared volume directly
>
> use sidecar container for each action container, read and send action logs
> to an external database(ElasticSearch here), and then invokers fetch logs
> from the external database
>
>
>
>  But both 2 approaches has some problems, the shared volume needs some
> time(several seconds) to sync file contents and ElasticSearch also need to
> take some seconds to save action logs and return them to invokers.
> ​
>  Then we finally come up with an another idea, which I think is preferable
> than above two, that to make action container capture the output of user's
> codes and then return them within the `run` request in a specified field
> like `__OW_LOGS`, so invokers can get action logs directly from the
> response of `run` uri, and this do improve the tps of activations. But this
> method also has some flaws needs to be solved.
> ​
>  Any idea about this? I'm also curious that have you faced same
> performance issue when run openwhisk on K8S and how did you resolved it?
> ​
> Sincerely
> Jiang PengCheng
>

Reply via email to