2020-08-27 14:50:57 UTC - Andrzej Janikowski: Hi all, we are using openwhisk in 
a big-player company in the energy industry. We are facing with a kind of bug 
related to the feature "pod-template" and the log retrieve (on Kubernetes). 
When we set the podTemplate in order to create other "sidecar" container, is 
not possibile to retrieve any log for the activationId (using wsk or api). Does 
anyone have seen this problem? We are using the last version of helm chart 
(commit f9179825e78879f40436dbb5386268a888a0f716). Attached the ConfigMap with 
the podTemplate and the yaml of helloworld pod.
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1598539857052700?thread_ts=1598539857.052700&cid=C3TPCAQG1
----
2020-08-27 15:18:01 UTC - Rodric Rabbah: welcome @Andrzej Janikowski to the 
openwhisk community
slightly_smiling_face : Andrzej Janikowski
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1598541481053600
----
2020-08-27 15:20:28 UTC - Rodric Rabbah: i dont know myself but im checking 
with others i work with
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1598541628053700?thread_ts=1598539857.052700&cid=C3TPCAQG1
----
2020-08-27 15:21:45 UTC - Rodric Rabbah: note that `wsk` is a wrapper around 
openwhisk API calls - it doesn’t execute any kubectl commands so there’s no 
distinction really.
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1598541705054100?thread_ts=1598539857.052700&cid=C3TPCAQG1
----
2020-08-27 15:52:16 UTC - Andrzej Janikowski: thanks a lot.. i suppose that the 
invoker expect always a single container called "user-action" into the pod 
ovewer the strategy to get containerId is based on the first container into the 
pod. I suppose the problem is related to class "KubernetesClient" line 301 `val 
nativeContainerId = 
pod.getStatus.getContainerStatuses.get(0).getContainerID.stripPrefix("docker://")`
 When there are multiple container this statement get always first (i don't 
think user-action is always the first)
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1598543536054300?thread_ts=1598539857.052700&cid=C3TPCAQG1
----

Reply via email to