Hi David, I just sent the signed grant to the secretary (cc'ed you).
Great to see that the dependencies are all ok wrt their licenses! Note that the granted source code zip [1] still has the Adobe copyright headers. We would have to remove/replace them. Bertrand told me that I would have to do this during the contribution process, I assume when committing this (exact) source code to a new openwhisk repo. Let me know what else I can do! Otherwise I assume I'll have to wait for the PMC's vote on the contribution. [1] https://github.com/adobe/wskdebug/archive/v1.1.2.zip Cheers, Alex ________________________________ From: David P Grove <gro...@us.ibm.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2020 06:55 To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org <dev@openwhisk.apache.org> Subject: RE: [Contribution] wskdebug Hi Alex, Thanks for pushing this forward! Once the grant is submitted to the ASF secretary we can push ahead with the formal process. Thanks for filling in more of the wskdebug.xml; I updated the version in the incubator svn repository to match. For the license check, the critical list is the production dependencies (what is required to run the released module). Dev dependencies are not blockers because end users do not need dev dependencies to use the released software. From your attached list the production dependency licenses are: - MIT: 99 - ISC: 20 - Apache-2.0: 8 - BSD-3-Clause: 3 - BSD-2-Clause: 3 - MIT*: 2 - Custom: http://github.com/substack/node-bufferlist: 1 (effectively MIT) - AFLv2.1,BSD: 1 - Unlicense: 1 MIT, ISC, Apache-2.0, BSD-3-Clause, BSD-2-Clause, Unlicense, are all "Category A" licenses [1]. All fine. AFLv3.0 is a "Category A" license. AFLv2.1 is not listed in any category at [1]. However, the one package with that license [2] is dual-licensed as either BSD-3-Clause or AFLv2.1. Since BSD-3 is Category A, we are fine. So, I see no license issues. Everything is Category-A. --dave [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html [2] https://github.com/kriszyp/json-schema/blob/master/LICENSE
