I think the images being actively used by Travis or jenkins testing should remain in the current repository their current usage should be as nightly builds only intended for dev and build integrating testing.
I think having the tag latest is not a big deal as it’s a default tag when pulling containers, but I’m not going to oppose if someone wants to change it to something like “dev” or like I had at one point “master” which then Rodric changes to “latest” :-) As for the convenient binaries of the release, I think these images should be build out of Apache jenkins server using the source code that is already released on the “dist” directory from Apache distribution server these images should not be in the current “openwhisk” docker namespace they should be pushed to the Apache “docker.io/apache/incubator-openwhisk-*:version” [1] We also need to check what are the ASF Infra requirements to host an image under the Apache namespace like the requirement to secure the image by signing the image or just have the digest/taghash documented for verification. [1] https://hub.docker.com/u/apache - Carlos Santana @csantanapr > On Jun 26, 2019, at 4:00 AM, Rodric Rabbah <rod...@gmail.com> wrote: > > For the demos, the asciiart image might be from Nick M but I think we can > extract the source into a repo from just the docker image. The spell checker > I may have the source for. It’s a bash script which was covered in a blog > post. > > Do you want to save the sources? We can make them demos under the docker > runtime repo, if so. > > For ballerina I would leave it. 1.0 is slated for release soon and I’ll pick > that up and update the runtime image. > > -r > >> On Jun 25, 2019, at 3:40 PM, Matt Rutkowski <mrutkow...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> Just made a pass through all images under the "openwhisk" moniker on Docker >> Hub: >> https://hub.docker.com/u/openwhisk/ >> >> assuring all have valid (short) descriptions and long descriptions that >> clearly describe each belonging to our Apache project proper (adapting 2 >> examples from other Apache projects, thanks Rodric). In addition, we BOLDly >> indicate these are convenience binaries and point back to the our Apache >> repos. in github where they are generated from as build artifacts. >> >> Along the way, I found the following images that I believe should be >> deprecated (i.e., deleted from Docker Hub) along with my notes as to when >> they stopped being used/generated and last build date: >> >> ------------------------------------------ >> - >> https://cloud.docker.com/u/openwhisk/repository/docker/openwhisk/action-ballerina-v0.975 >> (5 months, current version action-ballerina-v0.990.2), same major version, >> not sure who is maintaining >> >> ------------------------------------------- >> replaced by ow-utils: >> >> - >> https://cloud.docker.com/u/openwhisk/repository/docker/openwhisk/ansible-runner >> (7 months, replaced bu ow-utils image >> >> - >> https://cloud.docker.com/u/openwhisk/repository/docker/openwhisk/script-runner >> (7 months, replaced bu ow-utils image) >> * deprecated by this PR: >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/4158 >> >> ---------------------------------------- >> >> Kube related: >> >> - >> https://cloud.docker.com/u/openwhisk/repository/docker/openwhisk/kube-whisk-ansible-runner >> (10 months, replaced by ansible-runner) >> >> - >> https://cloud.docker.com/u/openwhisk/repository/docker/openwhisk/kube-whisk-script-runner >> (10 months, replaced by script-runner) >> >> - >> https://cloud.docker.com/u/openwhisk/repository/docker/openwhisk/kube-kafkapkginstaller >> (1 year+) >> - >> https://cloud.docker.com/u/openwhisk/repository/docker/openwhisk/kube-routemgmt >> - >> https://cloud.docker.com/u/openwhisk/repository/docker/openwhisk/kube-openwhisk-catalog >> * deprecated by these PRs >> * https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-deploy-kube/pull/239 >> (Kubernetes YAML removed) >> * https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-deploy-kube/pull/249 >> (Dockerfile removed) >> >> - >> https://cloud.docker.com/u/openwhisk/repository/docker/openwhisk/kube-couchdb >> * deprecated by these PRs >> * https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-deploy-kube/pull/239 >> (Kubernetes YAML removed) >> * https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-deploy-kube/pull/261 >> (uses ow-utils and initdb.sh script to run ansible playbooks in main OW) >> >> https://cloud.docker.com/u/openwhisk/repository/docker/openwhisk/kube-docker-pull >> (now uses ow-utils as part of “helpers”) >> * deprecated by these PRs: >> * https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-deploy-kube/pull/249 >> * https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-deploy-kube/pull/209 >> >> --------------------------------------------- >> Not sure of the history of Swift, but it appears that some of these images >> were early (dev.,test) attempts at publishing to DockerHub: >> >> - >> https://cloud.docker.com/u/openwhisk/repository/docker/openwhisk/action-swift-v4.0 >> (1 year+) >> - >> https://cloud.docker.com/u/openwhisk/repository/docker/openwhisk/action-swift-v4 >> (1 year+) >> - >> https://cloud.docker.com/u/openwhisk/repository/docker/openwhisk/swift3action >> (2+ years ago) >> --------------------------------------------- >> >> Early dev/test images? >> - >> https://cloud.docker.com/u/openwhisk/repository/docker/openwhisk/couchdb-snapshot >> (2+ years ago) >> - >> https://cloud.docker.com/u/openwhisk/repository/docker/openwhisk/couchdb-catalog >> (2+ years ago) >> >> --------------------------------------------- >> >> Also, found these old Docker SDK samples/demos? which would love to know >> where the source code exists for the actual code to see if we want to use as >> our own examples and automate builds for (perhaps as part of the SDK). >> >> Note: >> * they referenced bluemix home page… REMOVED >> * with the quote "This image demonstrates OpenWhisk's support for executing >> arbitrary code in a safe manner. Bring your own docker image.”. >> * Single tag “latest” (single push) >> >> https://cloud.docker.com/u/openwhisk/repository/docker/openwhisk/javaaction >> (2+ years ago) >> * No description >> https://cloud.docker.com/u/openwhisk/repository/docker/openwhisk/thumbnail >> (3+ years ago) >> * A example docker image that creates a polaroid-style thumbnail from a >> given image URL. >> https://cloud.docker.com/u/openwhisk/repository/docker/openwhisk/asciiart >> (3+ years ago) >> * A example docker image that creates a polaroid-style thumbnail from a >> given image URL. >> https://cloud.docker.com/u/openwhisk/repository/docker/openwhisk/spellcheck >> (3+ years ago) >> * A example docker image that includes a spell client that interfaces with >> aspell. (sic) >> >> Please comment if these can/should be deleted or if not please let us know >> why and how we proceed to make current. >> >> Thanks, >> Matt >>
