+1 to everything Rodric said! On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 at 14:07, Rodric Rabbah <rod...@gmail.com> wrote: > > If the weather package is functional and can run with newer node kinds then > I’d favor keeping it. > > I’d favor removing the combinators as we have composer now and we didn’t > document them properly (my fault). > > I would consider removing the bash installers since they’re redundant with > the wsk deploy manifest. > > I’m indifferent on version number. > > -r > > > On Jun 17, 2019, at 8:57 AM, David P Grove <gro...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > As Rodric mentioned in [1], the catalog is the last package we need to > > release before we can start on the main repo. > > > > This is a discussion thread to figure out what (if anything) needs to be > > done before we can start the release process. Here are three questions I > > have: > > > > 1. Should we remove the Weather Company package and let interested users > > get it from a downstream IBM repo, or is this a generally useful package > > that we should provide in the Apache release (like Slack and Github)? > > > > 2. Should we remove the combinator package? (It is marked as deprecated in > > the package install scripts). I think the functionality is now better > > provided by Apache OpenWhisk composer, but I don't know the full history of > > this package. > > > > 3. Should this release be numbered 0.10.0 or 1.0.0? > > > > --dave > > > > [1] > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ddf47c05e72426a47f0a414e1dd68cc6075fa4a60be1753318ebfe58@%3Cdev.openwhisk.apache.org%3E
-- Regards, James Thomas
