Refer to 'dnf' and not the deprecated 'yum'.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <step...@that.guru>
---
INSTALL.SELinux.md | 173 ---------------------------------------------------
INSTALL.SELinux.rst | 174 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Makefile.am | 2 +-
README.rst | 2 +-
4 files changed, 176 insertions(+), 175 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 INSTALL.SELinux.md
create mode 100644 INSTALL.SELinux.rst
diff --git a/INSTALL.SELinux.md b/INSTALL.SELinux.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 7aa048f..0000000
--- a/INSTALL.SELinux.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,173 +0,0 @@
-Running Open vSwitch under SELinux
-==================================
-
-Security-Enhanced Linux (SELinux) is a Linux kernel security
-module that limits "the malicious things" that certain processes,
-including OVS, can do to the system in case they get compromised.
-In our case SELinux basically serves as the "second line of defense"
-that limits the things that OVS processes are allowed to do. The
-"first line of defense" is proper input validation that eliminates
-code paths that could be used by attacker to do any sort of
-"escape attacks" (e.g. file name escape, shell escape, command
-line argument escape, buffer escape). Since developers don't
-always implement proper input validation, then SELinux Access
-Control's goal is to confine damage of such attacks, if they
-turned out to be possible.
-
-Besides Type Enforcement there are other SELinux
-features, but they are out of scope for this document.
-
-Currently there are two SELinux policies for Open vSwitch:
-1. the one that ships with your Linux distribution (i.e.
- selinux-policy-targeted package); And
-2. the one that ships with OVS (i.e. openvswitch-selinux-policy
- package).
-
-
-Limitations
------------
-
-If Open vSwitch is directly started from command line, then it
-will run under "unconfined_t" SELinux domain that basically lets
-daemon to do whatever it likes. This is very important for developers
-to understand, because they might introduced code in OVS that invokes
-new system calls that SELinux policy did not anticipate. This means
-that their feature may have worked out just fine for them. However,
-if someone else would try to run the same code when Open vSwitch is
-started through systemctl, then Open vSwitch would get Permission Denied
-errors.
-
-Currently the only distributions that enforce SELinux on OVS by
-default are RHEL, CentOS and Fedora. While Ubuntu and Debian also
-have some SELinux support, they run Open vSwitch under the unrestricted
-"unconfined" domain. Also, it seems that Ubuntu is leaning towards
-Apparmor that works slightly differently than SELinux.
-
-SELinux and Open vSwitch are moving targets. What this means
-is that, if you solely rely on your Linux distribution's SELinux policy,
-then this policy might not have correctly anticipated that a newer
-Open vSwitch version needs extra white list rules. However, if you
-solely rely on SELinux policy that ships with Open vSwitch, then
-Open vSwitch developers might not have correctly anticipated the
-feature set that your SELinux implementation supports.
-
-
-Installation
-------------
-
-Refer to [INSTALL.Fedora.rst] for instructions on how to build all
-Open vSwitch rpm packages.
-
-Once the package is built, install it on your Linux distribution with:
-
- # yum install openvswitch-selinux-policy-2.4.1-1.el7.centos.noarch.rpm
-
-And, then restart Open vSwitch:
-
- # systemctl restart openvswitch
-
-
-Troubleshooting
----------------
-
-When SELinux was implemented some of the standard system utilities
-acquired "-Z" flag (e.g. "ps -Z", "ls -Z"). For example, to find out
-under which SELinux security domain process runs, use:
-
- # ps -AZ | grep ovs-vswitchd
- system_u:system_r:openvswitch_t:s0 854 ? ovs-vswitchd
-
-To find out the SELinux label of file or directory, use:
-
- # ls -Z /etc/openvswitch/conf.db
- system_u:object_r:openvswitch_rw_t:s0 /etc/openvswitch/conf.db
-
-
-If, for example, SELinux policy for Open vSwitch is too strict,
-then you might see in Open vSwitch log files "Permission Denied"
-errors:
-
- # cat /var/log/openvswitch/ovs-vswitchd.log
- vlog|INFO|opened log file /var/log/openvswitch/ovs-vswitchd.log
- ovs_numa|INFO|Discovered 2 CPU cores on NUMA node 0
- ovs_numa|INFO|Discovered 1 NUMA nodes and 2 CPU cores
- reconnect|INFO|unix:/var/run/openvswitch/db.sock: connecting...
- reconnect|INFO|unix:/var/run/openvswitch/db.sock: connected
- netlink_socket|ERR|fcntl: Permission denied
- dpif_netlink|ERR|Generic Netlink family 'ovs_datapath' does not exist.
- The Open vSwitch kernel module is probably not loaded.
- dpif|WARN|failed to enumerate system datapaths: Permission denied
- dpif|WARN|failed to create datapath ovs-system: Permission denied
-
-
-
-However, not all "Permission denied" errors are caused by SELinux. So,
-before blaming too strict SELinux policy, make sure that indeed SELinux
-was the one that denied OVS access to certain resources, for example, run:
-
- # grep "openvswitch_t" /var/log/audit/audit.log | tail
- type=AVC msg=audit(1453235431.640:114671): avc: denied { getopt } for
pid=4583 comm="ovs-vswitchd" scontext=system_u:system_r:openvswitch_t:s0
tcontext=system_u:system_r:openvswitch_t:s0 tclass=netlink_generic_socket
permissive=0
-
-
-If SELinux denied OVS access to certain resources, then make sure that you
-have installed our SELinux policy package that "loosens" up distribution's
-SELinux policy:
-
- # rpm -qa | grep openvswitch-selinux
- openvswitch-selinux-policy-2.4.1-1.el7.centos.noarch
-
-And, then verify that this module was indeed loaded:
-
- # semodule -l | grep openvswitch
- openvswitch-custom 1.0
- openvswitch 1.1.1
-
-If you still see Permission denied errors, then take a look
-into selinux/openvswitch.te file in the OVS source tree and
-try to add white list rules. This is really simple, just run
-SELinux audit2allow tool:
-
- # grep "openvswitch_t" /var/log/audit/audit.log | audit2allow -M ovslocal
-
-See "Contributing SELinux policy patches" section, if you think
-that other Open vSwitch users would benefit from your SELinux policy
-changes.
-
-
-Contributing SELinux policy patches
------------------------------------
-
-Here are few things to consider before proposing SELinux policy
-patches to Open vSwitch developer mailing list:
-
-1. The SELinux policy that resides in Open vSwitch source tree
- amends SELinux policy that ships with your distributions.
-
- Implications of this are that it is assumed that the distribution's
- Open vSwitch SELinux module must be already loaded to satisfy
- dependencies.
-
-2. The SELinux policy that resides in Open vSwitch source tree
- must work on all currently relevant Linux distributions.
-
- Implications of this are that you should use only those SELinux
- policy features that are supported by the lowest SELinux version
- out there. Typically this means that you should test your SELinux
- policy changes on the oldest RHEL or CentOS version that this
- OVS version supports. Check INSTALL.Fedora.rst file to find out
- this.
-
-3. The SELinux policy is enforced only when state transition to
- openvswitch_t domain happens.
-
- Implications of this are that perhaps instead of loosening SELinux
- policy you can do certain things at the time rpm package is installed.
-
-
-
-Reporting Bugs
---------------
-
-Please report problems to b...@openvswitch.org.
-
-[INSTALL.rst]:INSTALL.rst
diff --git a/INSTALL.SELinux.rst b/INSTALL.SELinux.rst
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8593d7f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/INSTALL.SELinux.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,174 @@
+..
+ Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may
+ not use this file except in compliance with the License. You may obtain
+ a copy of the License at
+
+ http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+
+ Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT
+ WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the
+ License for the specific language governing permissions and limitations
+ under the License.
+
+ Convention for heading levels in Open vSwitch documentation:
+
+ ======= Heading 0 (reserved for the title in a document)
+ ------- Heading 1
+ ~~~~~~~ Heading 2
+ +++++++ Heading 3
+ ''''''' Heading 4
+
+ Avoid deeper levels because they do not render well.
+
+=========================
+Open vSwitch with SELinux
+=========================
+
+Security-Enhanced Linux (SELinux) is a Linux kernel security module that limits
+"the malicious things" that certain processes, including OVS, can do to the
+system in case they get compromised. In our case SELinux basically serves as
+the "second line of defense" that limits the things that OVS processes are
+allowed to do. The "first line of defense" is proper input validation that
+eliminates code paths that could be used by attacker to do any sort of "escape
+attacks", such as file name escape, shell escape, command line argument escape,
+buffer escape. Since developers don't always implement proper input validation,
+then SELinux Access Control's goal is to confine damage of such attacks, if
+they turned out to be possible.
+
+Besides Type Enforcement there are other SELinux features, but they are out of
+scope for this document.
+
+Currently there are two SELinux policies for Open vSwitch:
+
+- the one that ships with your Linux distribution (i.e.
+ selinux-policy-targeted package)
+
+- the one that ships with OVS (i.e. openvswitch-selinux-policy package)
+
+Limitations
+-----------
+
+If Open vSwitch is directly started from command line, then it will run under
+``unconfined_t`` SELinux domain that basically lets daemon to do whatever it
+likes. This is very important for developers to understand, because they might
+introduced code in OVS that invokes new system calls that SELinux policy did
+not anticipate. This means that their feature may have worked out just fine
+for them. However, if someone else would try to run the same code when Open
+vSwitch is started through systemctl, then Open vSwitch would get Permission
+Denied errors.
+
+Currently the only distributions that enforce SELinux on OVS by default are
+RHEL, CentOS and Fedora. While Ubuntu and Debian also have some SELinux
+support, they run Open vSwitch under the unrestricted ``unconfined`` domain.
+Also, it seems that Ubuntu is leaning towards Apparmor that works slightly
+differently than SELinux.
+
+SELinux and Open vSwitch are moving targets. What this means is that, if you
+solely rely on your Linux distribution's SELinux policy, then this policy might
+not have correctly anticipated that a newer Open vSwitch version needs extra
+white list rules. However, if you solely rely on SELinux policy that ships
+with Open vSwitch, then Open vSwitch developers might not have correctly
+anticipated the feature set that your SELinux implementation supports.
+
+Installation
+------------
+
+Refer to the `Fedora installation guide <INSTALL.Fedora.rst>`__ for
+instructions on how to build all Open vSwitch rpm packages.
+
+Once the package is built, install it on your Linux distribution::
+
+ $ dnf install openvswitch-selinux-policy-2.4.1-1.el7.centos.noarch.rpm
+
+Restart Open vSwitch::
+
+ $ systemctl restart openvswitch
+
+Troubleshooting
+---------------
+
+When SELinux was implemented some of the standard system utilities acquired
+``-Z`` flag (e.g. ``ps -Z``, ``ls -Z``). For example, to find out under which
+SELinux security domain process runs, use::
+
+ $ ps -AZ | grep ovs-vswitchd
+ system_u:system_r:openvswitch_t:s0 854 ? ovs-vswitchd
+
+To find out the SELinux label of file or directory, use::
+
+ $ ls -Z /etc/openvswitch/conf.db
+ system_u:object_r:openvswitch_rw_t:s0 /etc/openvswitch/conf.db
+
+If, for example, SELinux policy for Open vSwitch is too strict, then you might
+see in Open vSwitch log files "Permission Denied" errors::
+
+ $ cat /var/log/openvswitch/ovs-vswitchd.log
+ vlog|INFO|opened log file /var/log/openvswitch/ovs-vswitchd.log
+ ovs_numa|INFO|Discovered 2 CPU cores on NUMA node 0
+ ovs_numa|INFO|Discovered 1 NUMA nodes and 2 CPU cores
+ reconnect|INFO|unix:/var/run/openvswitch/db.sock: connecting...
+ reconnect|INFO|unix:/var/run/openvswitch/db.sock: connected
+ netlink_socket|ERR|fcntl: Permission denied
+ dpif_netlink|ERR|Generic Netlink family 'ovs_datapath' does not exist.
+ The Open vSwitch kernel module is probably not loaded.
+ dpif|WARN|failed to enumerate system datapaths: Permission denied
+ dpif|WARN|failed to create datapath ovs-system: Permission denied
+
+However, not all "Permission denied" errors are caused by SELinux. So, before
+blaming too strict SELinux policy, make sure that indeed SELinux was the one
+that denied OVS access to certain resources, for example, run:
+
+ $ grep "openvswitch_t" /var/log/audit/audit.log | tail
+ type=AVC msg=audit(1453235431.640:114671): avc: denied { getopt } for
pid=4583 comm="ovs-vswitchd" scontext=system_u:system_r:openvswitch_t:s0
tcontext=system_u:system_r:openvswitch_t:s0 tclass=netlink_generic_socket
permissive=0
+
+If SELinux denied OVS access to certain resources, then make sure that you have
+installed our SELinux policy package that "loosens" up distribution's SELinux
+policy::
+
+ $ rpm -qa | grep openvswitch-selinux
+ openvswitch-selinux-policy-2.4.1-1.el7.centos.noarch
+
+Then verify that this module was indeed loaded::
+
+ # semodule -l | grep openvswitch
+ openvswitch-custom 1.0
+ openvswitch 1.1.1
+
+If you still see Permission denied errors, then take a look into
+``selinux/openvswitch.te`` file in the OVS source tree and try to add white
+list rules. This is really simple, just run SELinux audit2allow tool::
+
+ $ grep "openvswitch_t" /var/log/audit/audit.log | audit2allow -M ovslocal
+
+Contributing SELinux policy patches
+-----------------------------------
+
+Here are few things to consider before proposing SELinux policy patches to Open
+vSwitch developer mailing list:
+
+1. The SELinux policy that resides in Open vSwitch source tree amends SELinux
+ policy that ships with your distributions.
+
+ Implications of this are that it is assumed that the distribution's Open
+ vSwitch SELinux module must be already loaded to satisfy dependencies.
+
+2. The SELinux policy that resides in Open vSwitch source tree must work on all
+ currently relevant Linux distributions.
+
+ Implications of this are that you should use only those SELinux policy
+ features that are supported by the lowest SELinux version out there.
+ Typically this means that you should test your SELinux policy changes on the
+ oldest RHEL or CentOS version that this OVS version supports. Check
+ INSTALL.Fedora.rst file to find out this.
+
+3. The SELinux policy is enforced only when state transition to
+ ``openvswitch_t`` domain happens.
+
+ Implications of this are that perhaps instead of loosening SELinux policy
+ you can do certain things at the time rpm package is installed.
+
+Reporting Bugs
+--------------
+
+Report problems to b...@openvswitch.org.
diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
index 80ac7aa..2588389 100644
--- a/Makefile.am
+++ b/Makefile.am
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ docs = \
INSTALL.Libvirt.rst \
INSTALL.NetBSD.rst \
INSTALL.RHEL.rst \
- INSTALL.SELinux.md \
+ INSTALL.SELinux.rst \
INSTALL.SSL.rst \
INSTALL.XenServer.rst \
INSTALL.userspace.rst \
diff --git a/README.rst b/README.rst
index ff8ad88..a9eb7d9 100644
--- a/README.rst
+++ b/README.rst
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ To use Open vSwitch...
- ...with DPDK, see `here <INSTALL.DPDK.rst>`__.
-- ...with SELinux, see `here <INSTALL.SELinux.md>`__.
+- ...with SELinux, see `here <INSTALL.SELinux.rst>`__.
For answers to common questions, refer to the `FAQ <FAQ.rst>`__.
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
