Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> writes: > On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 11:09:39AM -0400, Aaron Conole wrote: >> Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> writes: >> >> > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 07:58:21PM +0100, Markos Chandras wrote: >> >> On 09/08/2016 05:50 PM, Aaron Conole wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> It sounds like new feature territory, but you do make a case for >> >> > it being considered a set of fixes ... >> >> > >> >> > I agree - it straddles a line. I was hesitant to even ask, but in RHEL >> >> > we probably need to backport these anyway, so I made an assumption >> >> > (maybe poor) that other systemd distros might use the rhel scripts and >> >> > run into this class of issues also. Good net-izen, and all that :) >> >> > >> >> > -Aaron >> >> >> >> Hi Aaron, >> >> >> >> Thanks for the backport request. I am also interested in these fixes and >> >> it's something I could use in the SUSE package as well. For my point of >> >> view I see no blockers for those updating their 2.5.0 installations with >> >> these fixes in but I will do some testing on my end as well. >> > >> > I don't know whether we came to a conclusion on this or whether the >> > discussion just dropped. Is it still desirable? >> >> It's definitely desirable from my PoV. I'd like to see it, and have >> already gotten it packaged in a local copy of an RPM, just doing some >> testing. >> >> I don't know if Russell or Flavio have any thoughts. > > I'm OK with this backport, but I'll leave it to Russell since ultimately > it's to improve Red Hat integration.
Quick Update: After some testing, I may have one more patch related to this. So we can wait a bit before making a decision, I think. - Aaron _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
