On 10 September 2016 at 21:26, Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 01:48:53PM -0700, Joe Stringer wrote:
>> Valgrind reports:
>>
>> ==18725== 32 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 339 of 497
>> ==18725== at 0x4C29BBE: malloc (in
>> /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
>> ==18725== by 0x450F1F: xmalloc (util.c:112)
>> ==18725== by 0x41748E: replication_add_local_db (replication.c:137)
>> ==18725== by 0x40803B: ovsdb_replication_init (ovsdb-server.c:146)
>> ==18725== by 0x407C9E: ovsdb_server_connect_active_ovsdb_server
>> (ovsdb-server.c:1165)
>> ==18725== by 0x450AB3: process_command (unixctl.c:313)
>> ==18725== by 0x4500DC: run_connection (unixctl.c:347)
>> ==18725== by 0x44FFB6: unixctl_server_run (unixctl.c:400)
>> ==18725== by 0x4081AC: main_loop (ovsdb-server.c:182)
>> ==18725== by 0x406432: main (ovsdb-server.c:429)
>>
>> Fixes: 60e0cd041958 ("ovsdb: Replication usability improvements")
>> Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer <j...@ovn.org>
>> ---
>> This also affects branch-2.6.
>
> I'm surprised that neither Clang nor GCC gives a "value assigned is
> never used" warning for this code.
Me too.
> Acked-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org>
Thanks, applied to master and branch-2.6.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
