"dev" <dev-boun...@openvswitch.org> wrote on 08/22/2016 08:56:50 PM:
> From: Flavio Fernandes <fla...@flaviof.com> > To: dev@openvswitch.org > Date: 08/22/2016 08:57 PM > Subject: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v1] ovn: ensure datapath removal is proper > Sent by: "dev" <dev-boun...@openvswitch.org> > > Adding a unit test in ovn.at, to exercise the cleanup of > OF rules related to a logical datapath, when a logical > switch is removed. > > Reported-by: Guru Shetty <g...@ovn.org> > Reported-at: http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/discuss/2016-August/022478.html > Signed-off-by: Flavio Fernandes <fla...@flaviof.com> > --- > NOTE: This test is expected to fail at this time, as the bug is not yet fixed. > > tests/ovn.at | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++ > 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/tests/ovn.at b/tests/ovn.at > index 216bb07..604cdcb 100644 > --- a/tests/ovn.at > +++ b/tests/ovn.at > @@ -4319,6 +4319,64 @@ OVN_CLEANUP([hv1]) > > AT_CLEANUP > > +# 1 hypervisor, 1 port > +# make sure that the OF rules created to support a datapath are added/cleared > +# when logical switch is created and removed. > +AT_SETUP([ovn -- datapath rules added/removed]) > +AT_KEYWORDS([ovn datapath cleanup]) > +ovn_start > + > +net_add n1 > +sim_add hv1 > +as hv1 ovs-vsctl add-br br-phys > +as hv1 ovn_attach n1 br-phys 192.168.0.1 > + > +# This shell function checks if OF rules in br-int have clauses > +# related to OVN datapaths. The caller determines if it should find > +# a match in the output, or not. > +test_datapath_in_of_rules() { > + local expect_datapath=$1 stage_info=$2 > + echo "------ ovn-nbctl show ${stage_info} ------" > + ovn-nbctl show > + echo "------ ovn-sbctl show ${stage_info} ------" > + ovn-sbctl show > + echo "------ OF rules ${stage_info} ------" > + AT_CHECK([ovs-ofctl dump-flows br-int], [0], [stdout]) > + # if there is a datapath mentioned in the output, check for the > + # magic keyword that represents one, based on the exit status of > + # a quiet grep > + if test $expect_datapath != 0; then > + AT_CHECK([grep --quiet -i 'metadata=' stdout], [0], [ignore-nolog]) > + else > + AT_CHECK([grep --quiet -i 'metadata=' stdout], [1], [ignore-nolog]) > + fi > +} > + > +test_datapath_in_of_rules 0 "before ls+port create" > + > +ovn-nbctl ls-add ls1 > +ovn-nbctl lsp-add ls1 lp1 > +ovn-nbctl lsp-set-addresses lp1 unknown > + > +as hv1 ovs-vsctl add-port br-int vif1 -- set Interface vif1 > external-ids:iface-id=lp1 > +OVS_WAIT_UNTIL([test x`ovn-nbctl lsp-get-up lp1` = xup]) > + > +test_datapath_in_of_rules 1 "after port is bound" > + > +as hv1 ovs-vsctl del-port br-int vif1 > +OVS_WAIT_UNTIL([test x`ovn-nbctl lsp-get-up lp1` = xdown]) > + > +ovn-nbctl lsp-set-addresses lp1 > +ovn-nbctl lsp-del lp1 > +ovn-nbctl ls-del ls1 > + > +# NOTE: if a known bug is present, THIS WILL BREAK HERE > +test_datapath_in_of_rules 0 "after ls+port removal" > + > +OVN_CLEANUP([hv1]) > + > +AT_CLEANUP > + > AT_SETUP([ovn -- nd_na ]) > AT_KEYWORDS([ovn-nd_na]) > AT_SKIP_IF([test $HAVE_PYTHON = no]) > -- I agree that this patch doesn't work when applied to current master. When I tried it against the patch that backs out incremental processing "ovn-controller: Back out incremental processing" then it works, so I'm not that inclined to chase an independent solution to it that hard. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
