On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 7:45 PM, Ryan Moats <rmo...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> "dev" <dev-boun...@openvswitch.org> wrote on 08/11/2016 07:21:39 AM: > > > > > Signed-off-by: Numan Siddique <nusid...@redhat.com> > > --- > > This all looks does what it promises, so let's get the immediate > out of the way: > > Acked-by: Ryan Moats <rmo...@us.ibm.com> > Thanks for the Ack and review. > > > Having said that, I'm still concerned about what happens in the > kernel during an ovs-vswitchd restart... > > I *think* everything will be fine for active connections whose > flow rules are still in the kernel, but there will be a momentary > loss of connectivity for those connections that require an upcall > to access the flows known to vswitchd. > > If the above is right, then I'm willing to accept that, but it > begs two questions: > > (1) is this something that is too complex for a unit test case? > > (2) if it isn't too complex, how would one code such a unit > test case? > > > I am not too familiar with the vswitchd internals. So I am not sure about it. Thanks Numan _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
