On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 01:35:58PM -0400, Aaron Conole wrote: > Flavio Leitner <f...@redhat.com> writes: > > > The current ifcfg file lacks support for OVS DPDK Bond. > > > > Signed-off-by: Flavio Leitner <f...@redhat.com> > > --- > > rhel/README.RHEL | 20 +++++++++++++++++--- > > rhel/etc_sysconfig_network-scripts_ifup-ovs | 9 +++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/rhel/README.RHEL b/rhel/README.RHEL > > index 54c1b44..0f51be5 100644 > > --- a/rhel/README.RHEL > > +++ b/rhel/README.RHEL > > @@ -33,13 +33,16 @@ assignments. The following OVS-specific variable names > > are supported: > > * "OVSDPDKPort", if <name> is a physical DPDK NIC port (name > > must start with "dpdk" and end with portid, eg "dpdk0") > > > > - * "OVSDPDKRPort", if <name> is a DPDK ring port (name must > > + * "OVSDPDKRPort", if <name> is a DPDK ring port (name must > > start with dpdkr and end with portid, eg "dpdkr0") > > > > * "OVSDPDKVhostPort" if <name> is a DPDK vhost-cuse port > > > > * "OVSDPDKVhostUserPort" if <name> is a DPDK vhost-user port > > > > + * "OVSDPDKBond" if <name> is an OVS DPDK bond. > > + > > + > > Small nit - why insert two newlines here as opposed to one?
No good reason. Will follow up with v2. > Otherwise, this looks good to me. > > Reviewed-by: Aaron Conole <acon...@redhat.com> Thanks! fbl _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
