On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 09:35:38AM -0500, Ryan Moats wrote: > While this code is cleaner and more robust, running it against the same > end-to-end tests that I applied to Lance's original/V2 patches doesn't > result in the same small performance gain at larger port densities > and reveals a very slight performance penalty for lower port densities. > > This wasn't what I was expecting and leaves me wondering what is > causing the difference.
Are your performance differences within the normal margin of variation? _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
