Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote on 07/19/2016 01:40:29 PM: > From: Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> > To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS > Cc: dev@openvswitch.org > Date: 07/19/2016 01:40 PM > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] ovn: Make it possible for CMS to > detect when the OVN system is up-to-date. > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 10:29:34PM -0500, Ryan Moats wrote: > > "dev" <dev-boun...@openvswitch.org> wrote on 07/18/2016 01:30:10 PM: > > > > > From: Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> > > > To: dev@openvswitch.org > > > Cc: Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> > > > Date: 07/18/2016 01:30 PM > > > Subject: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] ovn: Make it possible for CMS to > > > detect when the OVN system is up-to-date. > > > Sent by: "dev" <dev-boun...@openvswitch.org> > > > > > > Until now, there has been no reliable for the CMS (or ovn-nbctl, or > > > anything else) to detect when changes made to the northbound > > configuration > > > have been passed through to the southbound database or to the > > hypervisors. > > > This commit adds this feature to the system, by adding sequence numbers > > > to the northbound and southbound databases and adding code in ovn-nbctl, > > > ovn-northd, and ovn-controller to keep those sequence numbers up-to-date. > > > > > > The biggest user-visible change from this commit is new a new option > > > --wait to ovn-nbctl. With --wait=sb, ovn-nbctl now waits for ovn-northd > > > to update the southbound database; with --wait=hv, it waits for the > > > changes to make their way to Open vSwitch on every hypervisor. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> > > > --- > > > > Hey Ben, while I like this patch, it is going to put incremental > > processing in merge conflict (again) if it lands first. I've put together > > a rebased version of this patch that sits on top of the remaining pieces > > of incremental processing and passes both compile and unit tests. > > Am I breaking process if I submit it as V3 with an updated commit > > message and an acked by even though I rebased it? > > You're worrying too much. I'll rebase my patch as necessary. I do it > routinely.
Ok, can you please send a rebase? I went to take a look at it today and it doesn't apply cleanly anymore... _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
