Ryan,
We see this use case a lot - essentially a FW between logical network segments,
and one could be the internet. It is not so much a chain but a link in a chain
:-0. The complexity is using load-balancers to scale the firewall to support
the scale of the application load. Which ends up looking a like this (excuse my
ascii art).
|
- App
|--FW -- | | - App
Internet -> LB1-- |--FW --- |- LB2---- | - App
|--FW -- | | - App
|
- App
Now if OSVS/OVN can do the load balancing the picture becomes simpler and more
interesting.
Thoughts?
j
From: Ryan Moats <rmo...@us.ibm.com<mailto:rmo...@us.ibm.com>>
Date: Sunday, July 17, 2016 at 7:02 PM
To: John McDowall
<jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com<mailto:jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com>>
Cc: "dev@openvswitch.org<mailto:dev@openvswitch.org>"
<dev@openvswitch.org<mailto:dev@openvswitch.org>>
Subject: Re: SFC: How about stages in both pipelines?
John McDowall
<jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com<mailto:jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com>> wrote
on 07/17/2016 08:18:48 PM:
> From: John McDowall
> <jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com<mailto:jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com>>
> To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: "dev@openvswitch.org<mailto:dev@openvswitch.org>"
> <dev@openvswitch.org<mailto:dev@openvswitch.org>>
> Date: 07/17/2016 08:18 PM
> Subject: Re: SFC: How about stages in both pipelines?
>
> Ryan,
>
> I assume you are thinking about L3 VNF support?
>
> If so yes I need to think this through - any ideas would be appreciated
>
> Regards
>
> John
>
> From: Ryan Moats <rmo...@us.ibm.com<mailto:rmo...@us.ibm.com>>
> Date: Sunday, July 17, 2016 at 6:15 PM
> To: John McDowall
> <jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com<mailto:jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com>>
> Cc: "dev@openvswitch.org<mailto:dev@openvswitch.org>"
> <dev@openvswitch.org<mailto:dev@openvswitch.org>>
> Subject: SFC: How about stages in both pipelines?
>
> John-
>
> To date, I think we've talked about adding an
> SFC stage to the ingress pipeline for logical
> switch datapaths and how to enable that via
> OpenStack/Neutron. Since OVN doesn't have to
> assume OpenStack as the CMS, I think we should
> also be adding that stage to the ingress
> pipeline of the logical router datapath.
>
>
> Ryan
I don't think I'm talking about L3 VNF support (at least
not that way I've heard the term used previously).
Rather, I'm thinking of how I might support VNFs that work
at network edges or boundaries (for example, an IDS/IPS for
traffic from the Internet). Since such VNFs would be
looking at inter-network traffic only, I don't think it
makes since to shoehorn them into the logical datapath
associated with a logical switch as that would require
making the ACLs more complex to ensure they don't have to
handle intra-network traffic. Since inter-network traffic
will pass through at least one logical datapath associated
with a logical router, I'm thinking adding an SFC stage
to the logical router's ingress pipeline would support
this scenario fairly cleanly at the OVN level.
I admit that I've no ideas yet on how to set up
networking-sfc to support such a scenario, but that
doesn't mean we can't add the code to OVN to support it.
Ryan
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
