>
>
>
> Its worrisome to have features that cannot be properly tested.
> I suggest to prioritize the test support.
> No testability -> No feature
>
That is fair. I am working on adding OVN tests to system-traffic.at so that
I can add NAT related tests.
>
>
>
>
> >
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> ---
> >> >> >> ovn/controller/ovn-controller.h | 3 ++-
> >> >> >> ovn/controller/patch.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++---
> >> >> >> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> diff --git a/ovn/controller/ovn-controller.h
> >> >> >> b/ovn/controller/ovn-controller.h
> >> >> >> index 6a021a0..8816940 100644
> >> >> >> --- a/ovn/controller/ovn-controller.h
> >> >> >> +++ b/ovn/controller/ovn-controller.h
> >> >> >> @@ -51,8 +51,9 @@ struct local_datapath *get_local_datapath(const
> >> >> struct
> >> >> >> hmap *,
> >> >> >> * with at least one logical patch port binding. */
> >> >> >> struct patched_datapath {
> >> >> >> struct hmap_node hmap_node;
> >> >> >> - bool local; /* 'True' if the datapath is for gateway router.
> */
> >> >> >> const struct sbrec_port_binding *port_binding;
> >> >> >> + bool local; /* 'True' if the datapath is for gateway router.
> */
> >> >> >> + bool stale;
> >> >> >> };
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> struct patched_datapath *get_patched_datapath(const struct hmap
> *,
> >> >> >> diff --git a/ovn/controller/patch.c b/ovn/controller/patch.c
> >> >> >> index 589529e..a701db2 100644
> >> >> >> --- a/ovn/controller/patch.c
> >> >> >> +++ b/ovn/controller/patch.c
> >> >> >> @@ -252,12 +252,14 @@ static void
> >> >> >> add_patched_datapath(struct hmap *patched_datapaths,
> >> >> >> const struct sbrec_port_binding
> *binding_rec,
> >> >> bool
> >> >> >> local)
> >> >> >> {
> >> >> >> - if (get_patched_datapath(patched_datapaths,
> >> >> >> - binding_rec->datapath->tunnel_key))
> {
> >> >> >> + struct patched_datapath * pd;
> >> >> >> + if (pd = get_patched_datapath(patched_datapaths,
> >> >> >> +
> >> binding_rec->datapath->tunnel_key))
> >> >> {
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Can you move the assignment outside the if condition?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > CodingStyle.md says "Avoid assignments inside "if" and "while"
> >> >> conditions."
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> alright
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> + pd->stale = false;
> >> >> >> return;
> >> >> >> }
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> - struct patched_datapath *pd = xzalloc(sizeof *pd);
> >> >> >> + pd = xzalloc(sizeof *pd);
> >> >> >> pd->local = local;
> >> >> >> pd->port_binding = binding_rec;
> >> >> >> hmap_insert(patched_datapaths, &pd->hmap_node,
> >> >> >> @@ -300,6 +302,13 @@ add_logical_patch_ports(struct controller_ctx
> >> >> *ctx,
> >> >> >> }
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> const struct sbrec_port_binding *binding;
> >> >> >> +
> >> >> >> + /* Mark all patched datapaths as stale for later cleanup
> check
> >> */
> >> >> >> + struct patched_datapath *pd;
> >> >> >> + HMAP_FOR_EACH (pd, hmap_node, patched_datapaths) {
> >> >> >> + pd->stale = true;
> >> >> >> + }
> >> >> >> +
> >> >> >> SBREC_PORT_BINDING_FOR_EACH (binding, ctx->ovnsb_idl) {
> >> >> >> bool local_port = false;
> >> >> >> if (!strcmp(binding->type, "gateway")) {
> >> >> >> @@ -332,6 +341,14 @@ add_logical_patch_ports(struct controller_ctx
> >> >> *ctx,
> >> >> >> }
> >> >> >> }
> >> >> >> }
> >> >> >> + /* Clean up stale patched datapaths. */
> >> >> >> + struct patched_datapath *pd_cur_node, *pd_next_node;
> >> >> >> + HMAP_FOR_EACH_SAFE (pd_cur_node, pd_next_node, hmap_node,
> >> >> >> patched_datapaths) {
> >> >> >> + if (pd_cur_node->stale == true) {
> >> >> >> + hmap_remove(patched_datapaths,
> >> &pd_cur_node->hmap_node);
> >> >> >> + free(pd_cur_node);
> >> >> >> + }
> >> >> >> + }
> >> >> >> }
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> void
> >> >> >> --
> >> >> >> 1.9.1
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> >> dev mailing list
> >> >> >> [email protected]
> >> >> >> http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > --
> >> >> > Russell Bryant
> >> >> >
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> dev mailing list
> >> >> [email protected]
> >> >> http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> dev mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
> >>
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
