"dev" <dev-boun...@openvswitch.org> wrote on 05/12/2016 04:38:21 AM:

> From: Mark Kavanagh <mark.b.kavan...@intel.com>
> To: dev@openvswitch.org, jim.lozanov...@ericsson.com
> Date: 05/12/2016 04:38 AM
> Subject: [ovs-dev] [PATCH RFC 1/1] netdev-dpdk: add jumbo frame support
> Sent by: "dev" <dev-boun...@openvswitch.org>
>
> Add support for Jumbo Frames to DPDK-enabled port types,
> using single-segment-mbufs.
>
> Using this approach, the amount of memory allocated for each mbuf
> to store frame data is increased to a value greater than 1518B
> (typical Ethernet maximum frame length). The increased space
> available in the mbuf means that an entire Jumbo Frame can be carried
> in a single mbuf, as opposed to partitioning it across multiple mbuf
> segments.
>
> The amount of space allocated to each mbuf to hold frame data is
> defined dynamically by the user when adding a DPDK port to a bridge.
> If an MTU value is not supplied, or the user-supplied value is invalid,
> the MTU for the port defaults to standard Ethernet MTU (i.e. 1500B).
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Kavanagh <mark.b.kavan...@intel.com>
> ---
>  INSTALL.DPDK.md   |  60 ++++++++++++-
>  NEWS              |   1 +
>  lib/netdev-dpdk.c | 248 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> +-----------------
>  3 files changed, 232 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)
>

This patch doesn't apply cleanly for me - do you intend to update
with another version?

Ryan
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to