On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 06:47:57PM +0530, Babu Shanmugam wrote: > On Monday 06 June 2016 08:30 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > >On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 02:31:03PM +0530, Babu Shanmugam wrote: > >>On Saturday 04 June 2016 01:17 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > >>>On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 03:35:44PM +0530, bscha...@redhat.com wrote: > >>>This patch makes ovn-controller configure queues directly on the egress > >>>interface. That is completely fine. However, it means that if the > >>>egress interface is on an OVS bridge (which is often reasonable, > >>>especially if bonding is involved), then ovs-vswitchd will fight with > >>>ovn-controller for control of the queues. This is a long-time issue in > >>>ovs-vswitchd, and there has been previous discussion: > >>> http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/discuss/2015-May/017687.html > >>>(Currently, I favor the solution proposed there of adding a new QoS > >>>type.) > >>I too feel that new Qos type is a better solution. I could not locate the > >>code which handles the new type, is it already available? > >None of the solutions presented there has been implemented. > Ben, when I was trying to work on linux-noop QOS type and I noticed a qos > type already in lib/netdev-linux.c named 'linux-default'. Can this qos type > work here?
Perhaps I am mistaken, but I believe that setting that QoS type will cause OVS to remove any existing qdisc from the interface. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev