On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 06:47:57PM +0530, Babu Shanmugam wrote:
> On Monday 06 June 2016 08:30 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 02:31:03PM +0530, Babu Shanmugam wrote:
> >>On Saturday 04 June 2016 01:17 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >>>On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 03:35:44PM +0530, bscha...@redhat.com wrote:
> >>>This patch makes ovn-controller configure queues directly on the egress
> >>>interface.  That is completely fine.  However, it means that if the
> >>>egress interface is on an OVS bridge (which is often reasonable,
> >>>especially if bonding is involved), then ovs-vswitchd will fight with
> >>>ovn-controller for control of the queues.  This is a long-time issue in
> >>>ovs-vswitchd, and there has been previous discussion:
> >>>         http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/discuss/2015-May/017687.html
> >>>(Currently, I favor the solution proposed there of adding a new QoS
> >>>type.)
> >>I too feel that new Qos type is a better solution. I could not locate the
> >>code which handles the new type, is it already available?
> >None of the solutions presented there has been implemented.
> Ben, when I was trying to work on linux-noop QOS type and I noticed a qos
> type already in lib/netdev-linux.c named 'linux-default'. Can this qos type
> work here?

Perhaps I am mistaken, but I believe that setting that QoS type will
cause OVS to remove any existing qdisc from the interface.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to