Sorry, I think I just realized that the "not" here is optional in English. But it did take me sometime to figure out :(
Han On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Han Zhou <zhou...@gmail.com> wrote: > Signed-off-by: Han Zhou <zhou...@gmail.com> > --- > FAQ.md | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/FAQ.md b/FAQ.md > index df6f225..cc4fdf6 100644 > --- a/FAQ.md > +++ b/FAQ.md > @@ -1056,7 +1056,7 @@ A: Yes. For traffic that egresses from a switch, > OVS supports traffic > > Keep in mind that ingress and egress are from the perspective of the > switch. That means that egress shaping limits the rate at which > - traffic is allowed to transmit from a physical interface, but the > + traffic is allowed to transmit from a physical interface, but not the > rate at which traffic will be received on a virtual machine's VIF. > For ingress policing, the behavior is the opposite. > > -- > 2.1.0 > > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
