On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Yin Lin <li...@vmware.com> wrote:
> ---
>  datapath-windows/ovsext/Actions.c      |  82 +++-----
>  datapath-windows/ovsext/Debug.h        |   1 +
>  datapath-windows/ovsext/DpInternal.h   |  29 ++-
>  datapath-windows/ovsext/Flow.c         | 171 ++++++++++++++--
>  datapath-windows/ovsext/Flow.h         |   7 +
>  datapath-windows/ovsext/Geneve.c       | 355 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  datapath-windows/ovsext/Geneve.h       | 122 +++++++++++
>  datapath-windows/ovsext/Gre.c          |   8 +-
>  datapath-windows/ovsext/Stt.c          |   2 +-
>  datapath-windows/ovsext/Tunnel.c       |   3 +-
>  datapath-windows/ovsext/Util.h         |   1 +
>  datapath-windows/ovsext/Vport.c        |  23 ++-
>  datapath-windows/ovsext/Vport.h        |  10 +-
>  datapath-windows/ovsext/ovsext.vcxproj |   2 +
>  14 files changed, 724 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 datapath-windows/ovsext/Geneve.c
>  create mode 100644 datapath-windows/ovsext/Geneve.h

These patches also need a signed-off-by line. Please see
CONTRIBUTING.md for the format and what this means.

I also had some additional comments (beyond the initial ones about the
checksums) that I sent in a previous message. Please take a look.

As Nithin mentioned, it would also be helpful if you provide a list of
what changed between revisions of the patches to let reviewers know
what you have done in response to their comments. You can do this on
each patch by adding three dashes after the commit message and then
your comments. This will cause the history to not be included in the
final commit message when the patch is applied.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to