Thanks for checking:

Acked-by: Justin Pettit <jpet...@ovn.org>

--Justin


> On May 18, 2016, at 8:40 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote:
> 
> The pull request seems OK to me.  Justin, do you have an opinion on this
> patch?
> 
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 06:22:23PM +0800, nickcooper-zhangtonghao wrote:
>> Hi Ben,
>>      Thank you for your advice. In general case, we run an ovs-vtep process 
>> on the hypervisor. 
>> In our network virtualization solution, we want to run multiple copies of 
>> the vtep simulator - ovs-vtep for the different network, 
>> such as the data/management/storage network.
>> 
>> Start the VTEP emulator:
>>      ovs-vtep --detach mgmt-network
>>      ovs-vtep --detach stor-network
>>      ovs-vtep --detach data-network
>> 
>> Bind the logical switch to a port:
>>      vtep-ctl bind-ls mgmt-network vnet0 0 ls0
>>      vtep-ctl bind-ls stor-network vnet1 0 ls1
>>      vtep-ctl bind-ls data-network vnet2 0 ls2
>> 
>> 
>> In fact, the vnet0/vnet1/vnet2 have been connected to the “vtep_ls1” bridge. 
>> So, the VMs of the different physical switches have been connected. 
>> This is arguably an ovs-vtep bug. I fixed this bug by including the physical 
>> switch name as part of the logical switch name.  
>> Darrell Ball did an initial test using the OVN gateway test case and did not 
>> see any issues with the proposed diff.
>> I have submited a pull request. https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/pull/126 
>> <https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/pull/126>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> nickcooper-zhangtonghao.
>> 
>> 
>>> On May 18, 2016, at 10:26 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 01:44:26PM +0800, nickcooper-zhangtonghao wrote:
>>>> signed-off-by: nickcooper-zhangtong...@opencloud.tech 
>>>> <mailto:nickcooper-zhangtong...@opencloud.tech>
>>>> 
>>>> The computer can run multiple ovs-vtep processes, but ovs-vtep processes 
>>>> share the “vtep_lsX” bridge when binding the physical-switch and 
>>>> logical-switch. The bridge created by logical-switch should be named  
>>>> according to logical-switch.
>>> 
>>> Hi Nick, thanks for submitting a patch.
>>> 
>>> You'll need to resubmit it for a number of reasons.
>>> 
>>> Your return email address was totally wrong and definitely not usable.
>>> I think I've corrected it; we'll see if my reply bounces.
>>> 
>>> Please use a short (<75 character) title.
>>> 
>>> Please limit lines in the commit message to 75 characters or so.
>>> 
>>> "Signed-off-by" goes at the end of the message and it should be
>>> formatted as:
>>>       Signed-off-by: Your Real Name <email@host>
>>> not as you did it.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Ben.
>> 

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to