On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 07:44:57PM -0700, Darrell Ball wrote: > On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 5:57 PM, Justin Pettit <jpet...@ovn.org> wrote: > > > > > > On May 4, 2016, at 12:03 PM, Darrell Ball <dlu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > This patch series updates the vtep schema, vtep-ctl commands and vtep > > > > It's not really a series. Even if it were, when looking at the commit > > history once its committed, it wouldn't show as a series. > > > > I actually did not think it mattered. > series == set, which could have a single member :-) > I'll remove the series part.
I think Justin's point is that series (regardless of their length) aren't apparent once they've been committed to the Git repository, since there's nothing to link them together at that point, which makes it confusing to refer to them in commit messages. It does make total sense to refer to series in the commentary that accompanies a patch (following ---), but that doesn't end up in the commit message. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
