Hi Christian, Thanks for reporting this. We don't usually backport features to older branches, but in this case I think in make sense to backport the whole commit, given that it's pretty much self contained.
I applied the commit to branch-2.5. Thanks, Daniele On 04/05/2016 07:49, "Christian Ehrhardt" <christian.ehrha...@canonical.com> wrote: >Just wanted to give this another ping to see what opinions are on that. > > >Kind Regards, >Christian > > >Christian EhrhardtSoftware Engineer, Ubuntu Server >Canonical Ltd > > > > > > >On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 2:37 AM, Christian Ehrhardt ><christian.ehrha...@canonical.com> wrote: > >Hi, >I've recently run a lot into extremely huge logfiles. >I found it related to messages like: >2016-04-25T06:25:29.464Z|00003|dpif_netdev(pmd18)|INFO|Core 9 processing port >'vhost-user-1' > > > >With many ports and queues set up it really gets bad with almost a Gigabyte >for 512 ports and even up to stalling the OVS adding ports due to massive log >writes. > > > >The good thing - I found it already fixed upstream in the form of: >https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/commit/ce179f1163f947fe8dc5afa35a2cdd0756bb53a0 > > > >I don't know if the new command and extra message part with queue-id is "too >much" for the 2.5 branch. But I'd personally totally like it applied to that. >If not the full patch then maybe at least just dropping the INFO to DBG of the >existing messages? > >Christian EhrhardtSoftware Engineer, Ubuntu Server >Canonical Ltd > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
