Hi Steve This thread is still getting filtered by OVS dev. I think we can close this thread off since there are no action items remaining on this topic and so I don't have to keep copying the e-mail content to another thread that does not get filtered :-).
Darrell --------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Darrell Ball <dlu...@gmail.com> To: Shi Xin Ruan <steve.r...@cn.ibm.com> Cc: ovs dev <dev@openvswitch.org>, "steve.ruan" <rsxi...@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 19:17:31 -0700 Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH V5 1/1] ovn-northd: Add support forstatic_routes. Hi Steve On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 7:00 PM, Shi Xin Ruan <steve.r...@cn.ibm.com> wrote: > Hi Darrel, > > > For "reconfiguration transitional cases", it will be issue for a short > moment. > Here is method to avoid it: > 1. remove all logical router ports which will not be used any more. > 2. add the new logical router ports; > The case I was thinking about was subnetting change "make-before-break". But what I meant by the last response below - is I don't think we should do anything special; meaning your change to the for loop where you added a break is fine. "The only normal usage I could think of for the original code in the previous patches is maybe for reconfiguration transitional cases, but thats beyond the scope of this kind of support and will waste CPU cycles ongoing for little to no gain. So better to avoid it." _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev