On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 02:56:03PM -0700, Joe Stringer wrote:
> Previously, whenever a set_field() action was executed, the entire field
> would become masked and the entire field replaced, regardless of the
> mask specified in the set_field() action.
> 
> In most cases this is fine, although it may lead to more specific
> wildcards than strictly necessary. However, in a particular case with
> connection tracking actions it could lead to the wrong behaviour.
> 
> Unlike most OpenFlow fields, the ct_{mark,labels} fields are typically
> unknown until the ct(...,recirc_table=N,...) action is executed however
> the packet may actually belong to a connection which has a nonzero value
> for one of these fields. This can lead to the wrong behaviour with flows
> such as the following:
> 
> in_port=1,ip,actions=ct(commit,exec(set_field(0x1/0x1->ct_mark))),2
> in_port=2,ip,actions=ct(commit,exec(set_field(0x2/0x2->ct_mark))),1
> 
> Connections flowing through these actions will always update the ct_mark
> field stored within the conntrack table. However, rather than modifying
> only the specified bits (0x1 in one direction, 0x2 in the other), the
> entire ct_mark field will be replaced. Such connections will constantly
> toggle the value of ct_mark between 0x1 and 0x2, rather than becoming
> 0x3 and keeping that value.
> 
> This commit fixes the issue by ensuring that set_field actions only
> modify the modified bits in the wildcards, rather than masking the
> entire field.
> 
> Fixes: 8e53fe8cf7a1 ("Add connection tracking mark support.")
> Fixes: 9daf23484fb1 ("Add connection tracking label support.")
> Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer <j...@ovn.org>

Acked-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to