On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 12:02:33AM +0200, Petr Machata wrote: > Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> writes: > > > We would be pleased to take additional ofproto pr oviders as long as > > they are clean and maintainable (and actually maintained). We would > > We will want to put forward code that is up to snuff. > > Regarding the "actually maintained" bit--that is the intention. But as > you are probably well aware, one never knows. So we will make the > second best thing and aim at making the backend cleanly separated.
Sure. > > want to make sure that the additional providers can be built without > > installing code that is available only under NDA. > > That is understood. The SAI backend will be optional. That's not exactly what I mean. I mean, there must be a way for users to compile your new backend without installing code that is available under NDA. To put it another way, if I cannot compile your new code without signing an agreement with you, then that is unacceptable and we will not take the patches. Thanks, Ben. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
