OK. I will. Ofer.
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 6:31 PM Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 06:25:51AM +0000, Ofer Ben-Yacov wrote: > > I understand that you met Ayal for a short talk during ONS. > > From what he told me I think there might be some misunderstanding so I > > would like to make it clear what the intent here is. > > First, in case I did not explain it clearly before, I do *not* mean that > > the right sequence is "connect -> disconnect -> connect". > > I completely agree with you that we should connect only once and the code > > does exactly that. > > In my opinion, the only point that we need to agree upon is how to get > the > > schema. > > What the patch does right now is open the connection once, retrieve the > > schema and continue to work using the same connection. > > > > I think the point of disagreement here is about whether we should > maintain > > a local copy of the schema or not. > > Since we want to retrieve the *entire* schema, we do not need to keep a > > copy of it locally. To validate that the schema hasn't changed, we just > > need to verify that the schema version hasn't changed. > > > > Does this make sense? > > Can you please separate the actual support for passive TCP from the rest > of this? You've conflated two issues. Submit a patch that supports > passive TCP, then one that adds the rest of what you want. Then we can > have a sensible discussion. > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
