"dev" <dev-boun...@openvswitch.org> wrote on 03/24/2016 03:29:28 PM:
> From: Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> > To: Hui Kang <hkang.sun...@gmail.com> > Cc: dev@openvswitch.org > Date: 03/24/2016 03:29 PM > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] ovn-architecture.7.xml: Clarify the > definition of Binding table > Sent by: "dev" <dev-boun...@openvswitch.org> > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 02:50:47PM -0400, Hui Kang wrote: > > For the sake of clarity > > > > Signed-off-by: Hui Kang <ka...@us.ibm.com> > > --- > > ovn/ovn-architecture.7.xml | 7 ++++--- > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/ovn/ovn-architecture.7.xml b/ovn/ovn-architecture.7.xml > > index 13acaf5..a588a0e 100644 > > --- a/ovn/ovn-architecture.7.xml > > +++ b/ovn/ovn-architecture.7.xml > > @@ -353,9 +353,10 @@ > > table to reflect the new port, e.g. add a flow to recognize > that packets > > destined to the new port's MAC address should be delivered to it, and > > update the flow that delivers broadcast and multicast > packets to include > > - the new port. It also creates a record in the > <code>Binding</code> table > > - and populates all its columns except the column that identifies the > > - <code>chassis</code>. > > + the new port. It also creates a record in the Datapath_Binding, > > + Port_Binding, and MAC_Binding tables (hereafter, <code>Binding</code> > > + table) of the Southbound database and populates all its > columns except > > + the column that identifies the <code>chassis</code>. > > Now this doesn't make any sense at all. Hi, Ben, from my understanding, as a new VIF with MAC address and flow are added to to the southbound database, these tables seem need to be updated. Is there any misunderstanding here? Thanks. - Hui > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > dev@openvswitch.org > http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
