On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 04:40:03PM +0000, Ansari, Shad wrote: > > I thought that the change-tracking code retained deleted rows for > > inspection until the tracking cache was flushed. If it doesn't, then > > maybe that should be changed. > > > > At the very least, I would think that the uuid of the deleted row would > > be available. > > The deleted row's values are unparsed so they are not available for > inspection. I did it this so as to ensure the user of the idl does not > reference "stale" values. I can rework this to leave the values around > (to be cleared when the track cache is flushed) if we think that is a > better approach.
It's kind of difficult to come up with a perfect answer here. Are the raw ovsdb_datum values still valid? Looking at those might be a reasonable approach in some cases. > The uuid of the deleted row is available though. Great. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
