Thanks for the reviews, Joe!

I just posted a v8 addressing your concerns,

  Jarno

> On Feb 17, 2016, at 4:00 PM, Joe Stringer <j...@ovn.org> wrote:
> 
> On 5 February 2016 at 17:41, Jarno Rajahalme <ja...@ovn.org 
> <mailto:ja...@ovn.org>> wrote:
>> There is no need to help connections that are not confirmed, so we can
>> delay helping new connections to the time when they are confirmed.
>> This change is needed for NAT support, and having this as a separate
>> patch will make the following NAT patch a bit easier to review.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme <ja...@ovn.org>
>> ---
>> net/openvswitch/conntrack.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c b/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c
>> index fa9ab25..fc0ef11 100644
>> --- a/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c
>> +++ b/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c
>> @@ -464,6 +464,7 @@ static bool skb_nfct_cached(struct net *net,
>> /* Pass 'skb' through conntrack in 'net', using zone configured in 'info', if
>>  * not done already.  Update key with new CT state after passing the packet
>>  * through conntrack.
>> + * Note that invalid packets are accepted while the skb->nfct remains unset!
>>  */
>> static int __ovs_ct_lookup(struct net *net, struct sw_flow_key *key,
>>                           const struct ovs_conntrack_info *info,
> 
> This seems unrelated to the patch.
> 
> I *think* that you're trying to say that 'if the packet is deemed
> invalid by conntrack, skb->nfct will be set to NULL and 0 will be
> returned.' I think that this is a documentation issue separate from
> this patch (Maybe could be combined with one of the earlier fragments
> in the series?).
> 
>> @@ -474,7 +475,11 @@ static int __ovs_ct_lookup(struct net *net, struct 
>> sw_flow_key *key,
>>         * actually run the packet through conntrack twice unless it's for a
>>         * different zone.
>>         */
>> -       if (!skb_nfct_cached(net, key, info, skb)) {
>> +       bool cached = skb_nfct_cached(net, key, info, skb);
>> +       enum ip_conntrack_info ctinfo;
>> +       struct nf_conn *ct;
>> +
>> +       if (!cached) {
>>                struct nf_conn *tmpl = info->ct;
>>                int err;
>> 
>> @@ -497,11 +502,16 @@ static int __ovs_ct_lookup(struct net *net, struct 
>> sw_flow_key *key,
>>                        return -ENOENT;
>> 
>>                ovs_ct_update_key(skb, info, key, true);
>> +       }
>> 
>> -               if (ovs_ct_helper(skb, info->family) != NF_ACCEPT) {
>> -                       WARN_ONCE(1, "helper rejected packet");
>> -                       return -EINVAL;
>> -               }
>> +       /* Call the helper right after nf_conntrack_in() for confirmed
>> +        * connections, but only when commiting for unconfirmed connections.
>> +        */
>> +       ct = nf_ct_get(skb, &ctinfo);
>> +       if (ct && (nf_ct_is_confirmed(ct) ? !cached : info->commit)
>> +           && ovs_ct_helper(skb, info->family) != NF_ACCEPT) {
>> +               WARN_ONCE(1, "helper rejected packet");
>> +               return -EINVAL;
>>        }
> 
> The comment points out what I think is the more obvious piece here:
> that the helper should be executed when the connection is/will be
> committed. The piece that I found less obvious was that "cached"
> implies that the helper was already executed (and therefore it
> shouldn't be run again). I don't know if there's a way to make this
> more obvious, for example with a "helper_executed" variable or
> similar. Up to you.

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to