Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote on 02/25/2016 03:41:16 PM: > From: Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> > To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS > Cc: dev@openvswitch.org > Date: 02/25/2016 03:41 PM > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v7 6/6] [ovn-controller] Add > incremental logical flow proessing > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 11:25:12AM -0600, Ryan Moats wrote: > > From: RYAN D. MOATS <rmo...@us.ibm.com> > > > > This code changes lflow_run to do incremental process of the > > logical flow table rather than processing the full table each run. > > > > Signed-off-by: RYAN D. MOATS <rmo...@us.ibm.com> > > This seems a lot like an RFC patch. What kind of feedback would you > like at this point? > > Thanks, > > Ben. >
The one thing I've found is that because of the need for resetting processing based on certain changes, the gain from this patch at scale isn't nearly what I had hoped when I started (see http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2016-February/066630.html for details, but ignore the first half of point #2, because it's not correct). I'm hoping that patching physical_run will result in something that is relatively quiescent during steady state... Ryan _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
