On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 08:46:44PM -0500, Russell Bryant wrote: > On 02/08/2016 08:45 PM, Russell Bryant wrote: > > On 02/08/2016 07:52 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > >> Without this additional check, SSET_FOR_EACH is happy to iterate over any > >> type that has a struct hmap member named 'map'. We have a number of these: > >> hmapx, shash, simap, and smap, in addition to sset. > >> > >> I guess another approach would be give each of these a unique member name, > >> but the short name 'map' is nice too. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> > > > > Acked-by: Russell Bryant <russ...@ovn.org> > > > > ACK on patch 1, as well. I seem to have only received patch 2, and not > > 1 or 3. They aren't in my spam folder, either. :-/ > > > > I guess I should clarify, I went and read patch 1 from the archives.
Thanks. I applied patches 1 and 2 to master. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
