Andy Zhou <az...@ovn.org> wrote on 05/02/2016 01:46:45 PM: > On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 5:53 AM, Liran Schour <lir...@il.ibm.com> wrote: > Python idl works now with "monitor_cond" method. Add test > for backward compatibility with old "monitor" method. > > Signed-off-by: Liran Schour <lir...@il.ibm.com> > > I glanced through the logic of most of the changes. They look find > in general. I have the same comment as the C IDL implementation: > The con_update seems to support > only one table at a time. May be that's an O.K. restriction in practice? >
I think it is OK. It allows the user to update many tables but not in a single operation. This API allows a typical client code for each component to cond_update a different table. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
