Thank you. There is no real reason for tx_qid to be atomic, IMHO. But let it be so.
Best regards, Ilya Maximets. On 27.01.2016 08:10, Daniele Di Proietto wrote: > Thanks for the patch, I applied this to master and branch-2.5 with > a minor change: since tx_qid is accessed concurrently by multiple > threads, it seems that it should be atomic. > > This is just a formality: I've used relaxed semantics so there should > be no change to the compiled code. > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
