>
>
> Do you think it's worth breaking out individual statuses this way?
> "ovs-ctl status" shows all OVS daemons' status; maybe "ovn-ctl status"
> should follow the same pattern.
>
The reason I chose to break it was because I was splitting ovn-northd and
ovn-controller into separate packages with separate startup scripts and
since the 'status' for each of those startup scripts should only get the
corresponding ones.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to