> On Dec 8, 2015, at 1:01 AM, Gray, Mark D <mark.d.g...@intel.com> wrote: > >> +Feature | Linux upstream | Linux OVS tree | Userspace | >> Hyper-V | >> +----------------------|:--------------:|:--------------:|:---------:|:- >> +----------------------|------:| >> +Connection tracking | 4.3 | 3.10 | NO | NO >> | >> +Tunnel - LISP | NO | YES | NO | NO >> | >> +Tunnel - STT | NO | 3.5 | NO | YES >> | >> +Tunnel - GRE | 3.11 | YES | YES | NO >> | >> +Tunnel - VXLAN | 3.12 | YES | YES | YES >> | >> +Tunnel - Geneve | 3.18 | YES | YES | NO >> | >> +QoS | YES | YES | NO | NO >> | > > [Gray, Mark D] > QoS is such a loaded term. It may be good to expand on this a bit.
What about breaking it into "Traffic Policing" and "Traffic Shaping"? Those are the two dimensions we usually focus on. --Justin _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
